User talk:Princedirk

Medieval confraternity
A tag has been placed on Medieval confraternity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Alvestrand (talk) 04:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * As reviewing administrator, I am giving you a few days to expand the article. for advice how to do it,see our guide to writing Wikipedia articles.DGG (talk) 04:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Thieves guilds
A tag has been placed on Thieves guilds, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. E Wing (talk) 04:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Many of your edits were reverted
Many of your edits were reverted, some by me, some by other editors. Sorry. This happens sometimes on Wikipedia. Your edits looked well intentioned, but they were problematic. In particular, many of your edits included commentary or reviews of D&D modules. Wikipedia needs to strive to keep a neutral point of view. What we can do is to quote reviews made by third-party, reliable sources. So in one of your edits you said of Palace of the Silver Pricess, '"10 out of 10" White Dwarf magazine."Should replace B2-Keep on the borderlands as the Basic set module"'. So very close! If you would have added the magazine issue and the title of the article, it would have been perfect! By giving that information other editors could confirm the information. The edit would likely have stayed. Indeed, in general the ideal Wikipedia addition includes references to reliable sources. Still, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you'll stick around. — Alan De Smet | Talk 05:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)