User talk:Princeneil

Please do not remove declined requests as these are important for review by other admins. Mr.Z-man 19:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

help me Is there any one who can help me and unblock me since I have left unblock reason alsoPrinceneil (talk) 16:23, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I have removed a duplicate unblock request, and disabled your "helpme" because it will not be effective: only administrators can respond to your unblock request, and they will be aware of it because all unblock requests are listed in a category which they patrol.


 * Because I have blocked so many of your socks in the past I will not respond to it myself, but will leave it to another admin; but to explain why Wikipedia is not for what you want to do I draw your attention to WP:No original research which includes:

"'If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.'"
 * JohnCD (talk) 16:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I had a look at some of your links; none of the third-party sources I checked mention your research. Just because they discuss a topic that vaguely resembles yours does not mean they discuss your theory. Huon (talk) 17:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

WP can never help me that's why i made violation and multiple accounts. when I was new 3 years ago, most of your editors told me that 1st you publish your paper, then we put it as reliable citation into corresponding article, now my work is well published in reliable Journal new York USA. but you all are just abusing me and my research work. I couldn't have thought about it that you will behave like this, although i was apologizing from 3,4 days for past issues. Since thousands of WP articles i have noticed that have no reliable source even no any reference at all, but you are not talking to them, I have lists of such WP articles. but you are only abusing me. I was not writing WP article on my published research now, but I was trying to put it as reliable source and citation for other WP articles(without giving my own name as asif's theory or equation even it has been published with my name as honor). Now I have understand that WP is just abusing site nothing else, do block all my accounts, do not unblock me!!! Princeneil (talk) 14:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

AN/I
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents 220  of  Borg 08:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

You are free to request an unblock now if you wish to, but, considering that right up to today you have been creating sockpuppets, lying (e.g. claiming to be a new editor), using Wikipedia to repeatedly re-create a deleted self-promotional page, and attempting to use subterfuges to hide what you were doing, my guess is that the likelihood of an unblock now is pretty low. My advice is to go away for six months, during which time you do not create any accounts and do not edit at all, then come back and make an unblock request, explaining how you intend to edit in the future, and how that will be different from how you did so in the past. In any case, every time you evade your block by creating a new account, you make it less likely that any administrator will unblock you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
220  of  Borg 13:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
220  of  Borg 12:08, 25 December 2014 (UTC)