User talk:Prinz.Deases

Welcome!

Hello, Prinz.Deases, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Richard Andrew Deases, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Planetary Chaos  Talk 10:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Andrew Deases


A tag has been placed on Richard Andrew Deases, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Planetary Chaos  Talk 10:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Andrew Deases


A tag has been placed on Richard Andrew Deases requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Planetary Chaos  Talk 13:04, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Andrew Deases


A tag has been placed on Richard Andrew Deases requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. red dog six (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Richard Andrew Deases. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. red dog six (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Richard Andrew Deases, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. red dog six (talk) 10:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Louis Ferdinand, Prince of Prussia
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. red dog six (talk) 10:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If you continue to change Louis Ferdinand, Prince of Prussia you will be in violation of the 3R, please stop your disruptive editing.  red dog six  (talk) 10:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Actually, having looked further into your autobiographical hoaxes, I have increased the block to indefinite. Please go away; this project isn't for silly hoaxes and impostors. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:45, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Re. your e-mail: LOL. So, your evil "uncle" was the head of a sinister conspiracy to wipe out the memory of your "father" and somehow managed to extinguish him from all genealogical listings, after your "father" went to America and died there? And everything your "father" left in America just happened to burn down? Yeah, right. Strange how they also managed to wipe his memory out retroactively from all the reliable genealogical publications in print that were published long before your "father" became an adult, and while your "grandfather" was still alive, right? Such as, Burke's royal families of the world from 1977, or Debrett's peerage from 1980. If I hear of anybody else on Wikipedia getting these sorts of e-mails from you, you'll get access to the e-mail facility and to this talkpage blocked too. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and BTW, how convenient that the entry on "Richard Deases" and his "parents" at, "the one and only place that still contains the records", was only added thirteen days ago, at just the same time you decided to push yourself into Wikipedia. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:19, 7 December 2011 (UTC)