User talk:Priorbegan1

Welcome!

 * }

September 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Chris Helme has been reverted. Your edit here to Chris Helme was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.myspace.com/chrishelmesolo) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Chris Helme
I don't think the edits that you keep inserting on this page are written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone. The versions are not balanced and rely heavily on criticism. The content is unsourced or poorly sourced "Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist". Disproportionate space has been given to the views of tiny minorities and therefore should not be included at all. The contect can clearly be seen as been biased and malicious. Given the potential impact on the biography subjects life and career edits must be balanced and fair to the subject at all times. Edits that are negative in tone, especially when they appear to have been created to disparage the subject, should be deleted at once. Please be responsible with future edits and if in doubt refe to Wikipedias guide on editing biographies of living people. thank you. (Whatisgoingonnow (talk) 19:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC))
 * Just for information, I have reverted again as the version that was reinstated losses all of the reference formatting leaving bare URLs. It also included a cite error. I suggested the user edit the current version and not just revert to the broken version. Keith D (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2012 (UTC)