User talk:Prioryman/Archive 1

Time-24hr/am-pm or AM-PM
I hate those AM/PM's as well. I have changed them all to 24hr in the 2010 eruptions of Mount Merapi article but as per WP styleguide -times but no doubt they will get changed. I hope I caught all your edits that I had overwritten by that large edit I did. Sorry if I missed any. Felix (talk) 20:55, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome


Hello, Prioryman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who put a certain post on a talk page. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * If you would like your own user menu, click here.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * New contributors' help page | Help
 * Where to ask questions | Frequently asked questions
 * Introduction to Wikipedia | Guide to Wikipedia
 * The simplified ruleset for Wikipedia | Manual of Style
 * Things to work on at Wikipedia
 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Questions, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! 220.101 talk\Contribs 06:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to 2010 eruptions of Mount Merapi. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. - 220.101 talk\Contribs 06:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Prioryman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! Mootros (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Nice start!
I saw your DYK article at DYK. The GLAM/WIKI conference opens at the British Museum on the 26th/27th so an appearance of your article would be good then. Is this OK with you? Were you aware of the BM project or is this a great coincidence? Victuallers (talk) 10:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Well the Roman cavalry one looks great too ... although your DYK hook needs checking. You say Greeks v. Amazons in the hook but the article implies this is not always so. You really need a ref straight after the dykfact in the article. You might also get more clicks with the Crosby Garret picture (about 100,000 people clicked on its article without the pic!). I will try and take one for the 26th and one for the 27th if thats OK with you. I'm co-opting you onto the BM project!! You'll need one of these for your page and you deserve the other

Ramses–Hattusili Treaty DYK nom
Hello! Your submission of Ramses–Hattusili Treaty at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Simon Burchell (talk) 22:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Prizes
Well they are built out of pure kudos so they have a value without measure. :-) Some people put them on their page, others leave them where they are. Look around at other peoples pages. Anyway cheers Victuallers (talk) 16:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ramses–Hattusili Treaty
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Korean War
I would like to invite you to participate in the discussion at Talk:Shelling of Yeonpyeong regards Mztourist (talk) 07:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hippika gymnasia
Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Cleveland Railway (England)
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of First Battle of Yeonpyeong
Hello! Your submission of First Battle of Yeonpyeong at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 28bytes (talk) 20:28, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Guisborough Helmet
Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for First Battle of Yeonpyeong
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Fort Julien
Hello! Your submission of Fort Julien at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Rosiestep (talk) 03:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Fort Julien
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Your article
Hi Prioryman, have you noticed that I started a new article on Shark attacks in Egypt before you did? Egyptian shark attacks conspiracy theory Of course my major topic differs a bit, but I am not sure we need two articles. Would you like to merge your article into mine? Cheers.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * On a second look I believe they both could be separate articles. Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Red Basilica
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Double DYK?
Hi Prioryman, Would you mind merging your DYK into this one? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:35, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Little observation
Hello, just a little observation: if you are making a new version of 2010_Stockholm_bombings_map_EN.gif, you could move the 1st explosion star to the other side of the junction. If we want to be precise, the explosion happened on the South East corner of Olof Palmes gata and Drottninggatan, when the star is now in the North West corner. (You can verify this on Google Maps street view. Current satellite coordinates are exactly right spot when viewed on Google Maps) I don't know if you meant to place it there, or just randomly put the star at the junction. The second explosion star is in the exact right spot, however. --hydrox (talk) 18:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I just noticed the same thing. For simplicity you are welcome to use this corrected map --Profero (talk) 21:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, I will amend it accordingly. Thanks for your help. Prioryman (talk) 21:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Fine. It was parked where the red car is on this picture.--Profero (talk) 21:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All done now. By the way, if you know Swedish, I'd be happy to create a Swedish-language version - all I need to know is how to write "1st explosion" and "2nd explosion" in Swedish. Prioryman (talk) 21:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * "1a explosionen" "2a explosionen" --Profero (talk) 22:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Or perhaps rather "1:a explosionen" "2:a explosionen"--Profero (talk) 22:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks. I've created the Swedish version of the map and added it to the Swedish article. Prioryman (talk) 22:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Great job, thanks! --hydrox (talk) 19:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Wank (mountain)
Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Best. Hook. Ever. Lampman (talk) 13:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

3RR (retracted)
Haven't submitted 3RR yet and on second thought I think that I'll extend the same courtesy that other editors have extended to issues such as these and provide friendly warning. GoetheFromm (talk) 13:22, 17 December 2010 (UTC) So friendly reminder instead. By the way the reasoning for the warning is that: your edits on the 15 of December (and the 16) were largely manual reverts of others. Next, your edit summaries acknowledge that your edits were reverts. Last, your reverts totaled more than 3, despite consecutive edits. Therefore, I suspected 3RR violation or at least 'hitting' 3RR (DougWeller's terminology). Also, the frenetic quality of your suggestions at talk pages (and comments directed to you) lead me to believe that a warning is an appropriate approach to prevent hitting 3RR and/edit war. Again friendly reminder. GoetheFromm (talk) 13:22, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

I see that you already removed warning, was going to address this myself. GoetheFromm (talk) 13:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Ellingham Hall
HI! Thanks for writing this article. I love english manor houses myself. Are you positive it is in Norfolk though? Most news reports say the "Suffolk mansion". I know there is a different one in Northumberland. Maybe they got it wrong.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * They got it wrong! The mansion is just north of the Norfolk-Suffolk border. You can see this for yourself if you go to http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/opendata/viewer/ and search for "Ellingham, Norfolk". You'll notice the dashes of the county border running along the middle of the River Waveney, just south of Ellingham. Prioryman (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Twelve Generals' Letter
Thank you for your DYK review and for taking the time to do a copyedit - I really appreciate it... GregorB (talk) 21:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ellingham Hall, Norfolk
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Revert on 12/19/10
Prioryman, allow me to explain my last revert. I absolutely agreed with you that there were false statements on the page. However, I disagreed with the wholesale manner in which you removed the majority of writing without editing. So, I reverted your edit, to be able to work with the original. I then immediately made revisions and wanted to save the changes, but unfortunately, my internet went and only was restored today due to weather. So, frustratingly, I could not put the revisions after my revert of your work. So very sorry. You will see that I put those changes (which I worked hard to do) today (12/20/10). Trust me, I was so worried that you would think that I was trying to keep false information, which I am certainly not interested in doing. Btw, next time you have such a concern, feel free to contact me on my talk page. GoetheFromm (talk) 19:19, 20 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Please see your discussion page for a reply. Prioryman (talk) 20:30, 20 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Got it, next time please create a new section, please. GoetheFromm (talk) 22:40, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation of "Ellingham Hall"
The Dab'n facilities for "Ellingham Hall" are a mess that you're not going to be able to fix w/o admin help. (By the way, you are not the only one whose misunderstandings have contributed to the problems.) I think i'll be able to manage the fix, but you can help me with one clarification. I think it's clear that there are two places, each being referred to (where the respective contexts make the meaning clear) as "Ellingham Hall". And so far, each of them is being treated as worthy of a WP article. The combination of those two circumstances is what requires a Dab page. That leaves unclear one final factor: "Is there a primary topic?" As discussed at the target section of that link, "There are no absolute rules for determining" the answer. It is quite feasible to assume, for the time being and w/o prejudice to a future change, that the answer is "no", and make a change later if it seems appropriate, but if you would care to review that section and offer an opinion based on your knowledge of the subject matter, i would quite comfortably act on your opinion (without prejudice to a future contrary change!), since making the right decision now might save effort and leave a clearer record in the edit histories of the relevant pages. You could productively respond by adding to this section, since i'll watch changes to this talk page for a while. Thanks for your attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerzy (talk • contribs) 00:33, 21 December 2010
 * For future reference, i suggest that your well-intentioned edit summary "Created new EH, Northumberland article", while it mentions the context of the edit, invites confusion: true, one can see by looking at diffs that your edit was what other editors might have summarized with something like one of the following:
 * rv
 * reverted to Dab
 * reverted back to Dab, having met the objection of the preceding editor
 * reverted to Dab, having created article on EH, Northumberland
 * rv, having created article Ellingham Hall, Northumberland
 * I was slowed down in my analysis of the history until i went thru the diffs chronologically, bcz "Created new EH, Northumberland article" gives me as first impression the expectation that the editor created an article whose topic is "Ellingham Hall, Northumberland" on the page the history is part. If, instead, the article does not bear the natural title for that topic, my next thot would be to seek evidence indicating whether it is more likely that another title was deemed suitable to the topic, or that the page had later been renamed, say in a merge or split of the article. In the circumstance here, where looking at the preceding history entry would show that the page pre-existed that edit, my first expectation would be that the summary meant what i would summarize as "blanked ex'g article; creating in its place new EH, Northumberland article" (in the rare circumstances where such an overwriting would be justified).  I hasten to add that IMO most editors learn (as i have) primarily by making intelligent guesses and correcting both bad edits and assumptions as needed, rather than by studying the voluminous policies and guidelines.  This message is information for future use, not to complain about what i regard as your suitably BOLD editing. Thanks! --Jerzy•t 01:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * At talk:Ellingham Hall, i've laid out a more thoro analysis of what's gone before and the ensuing options. If you want to discuss the fate of the EH page, let's do it in the wider forum that that link provides; general editing issues, confusing stuff i doubtless said, etc., will be easier to write and follow if we both edit this section for those purposes. --Jerzy•t 05:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Blood Qur'an
Hello! Your submission of Blood Qur'an at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Zoeperkoe (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Sotra Facula
Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Blood Qur'an
Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for 2010 Sharm el-Sheikh shark attacks
Materialscientist (talk) 14:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Umm al-Qura Mosque
Materialscientist (talk) 02:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of ZX81
Hello! Your submission of ZX81 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

You are only about 50 characters short of 5x (after excluding tables and lists according to DYK rules). KimChee (talk) 23:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Winner! KimChee (talk) 00:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for ZX81
Dravecky (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * A very nice article expansion. Good job. FruitMonkey (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:ZX81BASICProgramming.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ZX81BASICProgramming.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ZX81 WHSmith advert.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ZX81 WHSmith advert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PCW cover June 1981.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PCW cover June 1981.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:20, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ZX81 peripherals promotion.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ZX81 peripherals promotion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Interactive urinal
Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You can find further appreciation of your writing here. :) Kudos! -- Black Falcon (talk) 01:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Online Ambassadors
I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 01:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Seneb
Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Cholesbury Camp
Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Please make comments on my talk page re: edits that you don't like
Please exercise the courtesy of notifying me of your concerns on my talk page when referencing my name on other talk pages. I'd do the same for you. Best, GoetheFromm (talk) 01:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I've simply asked Dougweller to (re)explain his earlier comment about the necessity of the lead reflecting the article's content. If you don't understand why then I strongly suggest that you go and read WP:LEAD. I've already explained it on the article talk page - how many more times do I need to explain it? Prioryman (talk) 01:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Prioyman, as you are very aware, Aero and I and many others have discussed many ways to edit the article for clarity and non-repetitiveness. You don't need to distract by referring generally to lead.
 * The controversy of interpreting the Cylinder is already mentioned in the lead. You want to include a lot more information regarding the British Museum (surprise!) and  interactions with Ahmadinejad (which is not what makes the cylinder notable).  All this information is already in the appropriate places in the article.
 * Please accept that you are going to have to work with others on this and not dominate. Thanks, GoetheFromm (talk) 01:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * The lead is supposed to reflect the contents of the body of the article. Yes, it is going to repeat in summary form what is in the body. That is what the lead is for! As for the controversy, I've pointed out on the talk page that the lead did not make any mention of the "human rights" controversy or the exhibition history, both of which are major topics in the article. WP:LEAD requires these to be mentioned in the lead. This is not optional - we do not get to pick and chose which parts of the article to summarise. All the major topics have to be summarised. This means that the "human rights" controversy has to be mentioned, summarising the positions on either side of the argument. As I've said on the talk page, if you want to improve the wording of the lead please do, but it has to reflect the contents of the article. Prioryman (talk) 01:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Wow, you are totally missing the point. But whatever, will work on editing the lead.  GoetheFromm (talk) 02:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Would you mind explaining what "the point" is? In particular what you mean by "repetitive"? It would help if you could explain how you think the lead can summarise the content of the article without being "repetitive". Prioryman (talk) 02:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/Statistics 2010
I came across Today's featured article/Statistics 2010 doing WP:NPP work. Nice page! It is interesting to get feed back (page views) on whether it was all worth the effort to reach FA status. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, glad you find it useful. I've already done all of 2011 up to the present date - see Today's featured article/Statistics. Prioryman (talk) 13:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Live at Fillmore West
Hello, I've updated the Live at Fillmore West page as requested. Hope you'll be happy with it. yorkshiresky (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Lion Gate
Yes, your hook looks much more interesting.Alexikoua (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Your conduct
What do you want? Is this move by you a simple ugly aggression because you weren't content with my opinion?Doogielien (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

User:AFolkSingersBeard
Hi. I warned User:AFolkSingersBeard about the consequences of edit-warring. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

You
You making two articles on the same subject is wrong and stupid. I am going to do everyhting in my power to to combine both articles or get one deleted. You won't get away with this. B-Machine (talk) 04:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Calm down, for goodness' sake! There's no need to take it as a personal insult. Prioryman (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Prioryman, having some experience with B-Machine's b.s. myself on this article's talk page here in which he sole interest seems to be trolling and looking for trouble by repeatedly removing relevant discussion material to the article, I can tell you that you are not alone in feeling pestered by this user. B-Machine, might I suggest you stop trolling on this website. So as to avoid breaking the three revert rule, I now suspect he's sockpuppeting as another user on that article's discussion page. Typical troll behavior. B-Machine, If you'd like to contribute respectably, you're more than welcome to; however, if you'd like to just continue being an ass and causing trouble, get the hell off Wikipedia! 66.175.205.221 (talk) 09:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

I apologize, Prioryman. Sometimes my emotions get the best of me when it comes to articles related to war. I was wrong and stupid for the statement I made. If I offended you, I'm sorry. B-Machine (talk) 18:06, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Ajdabiya
The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy delete nominations
Hello, when you nominate an article for speedy deletion, can you please let the author know? This is to let them know what is happening so they get a chance to challenge the nomination, or improve the article, or for education so that they do not keep making unsuitable articles. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks - will do. Prioryman (talk) 10:40, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Your turn
Now, how about you remove the "sour grapes" accusation? B-Machine (talk) 17:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you - done. Prioryman (talk) 18:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

This whole thing wouldn't have started if you didn't start the other article without any notification. That's not right. You started this. You know they're the same, so why are you doing this? B-Machine (talk) 14:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't be silly. No "notification" is required before a new article is created. And the two are certainly not the same, as I've said at length several times. Prioryman (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Le Blockhaus d'Éperlecques
Hello! Your submission of Le Blockhaus d'Éperlecques at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!


 * handy you already having a section for it. I set the overall assessment to start for the purposes of the Milhist checklist. When all the boxes are ticked (to use the popular phrase) it should read as B-class. If WP:Milhist ever institute C class ratings then a partial set of B-checks would show as C. I ticked the three easiest ones to assess. Having had another look, there seem to be enouigh citations to tick that one too. As to whether the coverage is sufficient, i don't know. You are welcome to assess it yourself, at this level there is generally not assumed to be a conflict of interest. GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK Operation Fustian
Hi thanks for the review I have left a query for you at T:TDYK Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No problems in truth I would have problems expanding any further Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK issue
Hello! Your submission of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1983 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 22:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of owners of Warwick Castle
Hello! Your submission of List of owners of Warwick Castle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dabomb87 (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Cassel, Nord
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Savage DYKs
Hi Prioryman,

I guess it's the only solution. My one suggestion would be that I would ask for the votes of only editors who are uninvolved in Savage-deletion debates elsewhere, to try to minimize the spillover of those debates here. I'm disappointed that these editors brought their war to us in the first place, and the last thing we need is to invite all of the partisans on this on either side into a new fray based on their preconceived notions about Savage. Your conversation with Rob was pretty disheartening; I want to give his views a fair hearing, but since he's posted 10+ times without citing a single piece of policy, it's hard to see how there's any room for rational discussion there. You might also consult long-time DYKers such as User:Gatoclass and User:Materialscientist directly on the issue and see if they can offer a neutral way to proceed, or ask those who originally expressed concern about this one way or another (like OC, Crisco, BarkingMoon, etc.) to comment, though be sure to avoid canvassing only those of one side. I am going to try to stay out of it after this, though--I still owe myself that wikibreak, and this has been postponing it badly! Cheers, Khazar (talk) 13:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Nusisance
AND YOU TRY A LITTLE POLITENESS when contacting someone. If you had bothered to read the comments on my talk page you would have seen that I was getting help. So YOU stop pestering people unnecessarily. (Sandots (talk) 23:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC))
 * I looked at what he posted on your talk page and found nothing impolite about it. Eeekster (talk) 03:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Jisr ash-Shugur
Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Blockhaus d'Éperlecques
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's now featured on Portal:Germany. If you have other DYK related to Germany, please place it there yourself. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Marilyn Manson's eighth studio album
Hello! Your submission of Christianity Manufactures Yesterday's Killers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:41, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:01, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Kingdom of Africa
Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for SS Empire Deed
Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Duployan shorthand
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Curse of 39
Hello! Your submission of Curse of 39 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 22:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

La coupole
Excellent job with Watten and Wizernes pages! --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 21:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Still got Mimoyecques to do... Prioryman (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I am plan to add more information about the work (concentration) camps around Watten/Wizernes and the role of the French resistant Joseph Dubar and his network Ali-France in the discovery of Watten. This info is strangely missing from UK/US official history books.
 * Concerning Mimoyecques, I have been collecting all the information already available about it (V3 page + bombings) under the name Fortress of Mimoyecques. I was planning to incorporate the information contained in this very interesting French page: http://html2.free.fr/canons/basev3.htm.
 * Nice work! It probably won't surprise you that I have a lot of documentation about Mimoyecques (I visited the V-weapon sites only about six weeks ago), so I'll make a start on adding what I've got. Thanks very much for all of your help. Prioryman (talk) 09:54, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for List of owners of Warwick Castle
Calmer  Waters  00:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Game of Thrones ident.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Game of Thrones ident.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Purushanda
The DYK project (nominate) 06:04, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikibombing
Satire? I wish!  Will Beback   talk    02:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Fortress of Mimoyecques
Thanks for the DYK nomination. I was not necessary but I appreciate it. Please go ahead with the GA nomination. I am in the same process with the article Disney bomb (the one recently removed from Watten bunker). I will help you with it. My meticulous improvement of Mimoyecques references was already done with the GA nom in mind. --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 11:57, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Curse of 39
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for La Coupole
Calmer  Waters  12:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Congratulations on your 22k views!! Amazing indeed. Excellent job.--Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 07:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, indeed. It's featured and listed at p:de (repeated), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Franz Xaver Dorsch
The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Edit Warring Again
Please do not edit war. You know what it will lead to if you continue. Discuss the issue on the article talk page (remember, bold, revert, discuss). Thanks. GoetheFromm (talk) 19:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Fortress of Mimoyecques
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sensational! Gracing Germany, as the 2 above, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 51K+? The sky is the limit! I am very happy that our article attracted so many people. I will proudly put this DYK on my talk page. I added a couple of paragraphs to the article putting historically the multi-chamber cannon into perspective: It was a 75-year French/US (or US/French) project that was picked up by Nazi Germany. Your comments will be appreciated. --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 07:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That's staggering - would you believe it's now Wikipedia's all-time fourth most viewed DYK? I'm amazed! The V-3 article got nearly 36K+, too, which puts it just outside the all-time top 10... Prioryman (talk) 07:21, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Moyecques
An article is not properly categorized just because it has a "category" transcluded by its stub template; the stub categories are temporary maintenance categories which are removed from an article once its expanded beyond stub length. So an article is correctly tagged as being uncategorized if it doesn't have any real, permanent content categories on it, even if it has 50 stub templates. Bearcat (talk) 07:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * So what is the solution? It's a stub article and it's correctly listed in the stub category for that region. Prioryman (talk) 07:48, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I take the liberty to intervene in this discussion. I added the article to the category "Hameaux of Pas-de-Calais". This should settle the issue. Not sure why the category uses the French word Hameau instead of Hamlet.  Taxonomy, to be or not to be? ;-)) --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 07:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Turahanoğlu Ömer Bey
Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Great Mosque of al-Nuri (Mosul)
Calmer  Waters  16:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Tonogayato Garden
Calmer  Waters  00:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration Notification
Hello, due to recent events a request for arbitration has been filed by regarding long standing issues in the "Cult" topic area. The request can be found at Arbitration/Requests/Case The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 07:39, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Per this request, having carefully reviewed your contributions to the RFC/U and it's talk page. I have to agree that I made a mistake on including you in the Arbcom Request. You seem to be editing in good faith even if I disagree with your evaluation of the evidence; thus I have struck you from the filing. I hope the next time we meet it will be under friendlier circumstances. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 21:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Please take me off the list
Hi, I am unsure why you want taking of the list, you have been a very vocal supporter (perhaps one of the most supportive) of User:Cirt's contributions at multiple locations, could you please explain why you want removing, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 01:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Please see my explanation on RA's talk page. Prioryman (talk) 05:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Svið
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Murder of Julia Martha Thomas
EncycloPetey (talk) 08:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
I'd be happy to look it over. Will do so soon. Thanks,  R uby2010   comment!  20:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Watten
Hi. I have been looking into the reference problem. It had nothing to do with reformatting. ;-) One was erased during an edit and two references were added by me but I forgot to cite them in the text. See my answer on the corresp. page.

I have added some information to the page because I am not happy with the chronology and it gave the impression that the British were all in to bomb Watten, which is the least we can say. They needed human intelligence, pictures, aerial photos to decide. The rocket was an unknown weapon at that time and most scientists doubt of its existence. It is very well explained in the recent BBC documentary on operation crossbow.

The main remaining issue IMHO is the list of raids on Watten. There are some discrepancies with the "official" list available on the official website: http://www.leblockhaus.com/modulosite2/board-of-25-bombings-gb.htm In my opinion, your list is more reliable because it is sourced but still, people may not be happy with it. How could we solve this? Any idea? --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 11:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gruffalo-screenshot.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Gruffalo-screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

RfAr Cults
Hi.

I've reinstated you as a party. This will ensure that you are kept up to date with notifications about it and alert you to the need to monitor the /Evidence and other pages when the case opens. Roger Davies talk 06:37, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Icelandic Phallological Museum
Hello! Your submission of Icelandic Phallological Museum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Sharktopus  talk 18:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Gisborough Priory
Revision as of 08:49, 29 July 2011 (edit) (→The alum legacy of the dissolution: - removed non-relevant line & apparently incomplete sentence)

I'm not sure what your intention was here: could you explain? Francis Hannaway 22:01, 29 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Prioryman! Thanks for your reply.
 * My intention - maybe clumsily written - was to show a link between the legacy of the dissolution of Gisborough Priory and the present time ... with present day places and people. I admit that they don't show a direct description of the structure of the building or the daily life of the priory, but instead bring it to life in the context of modern England.


 * You have said that "In 1932, Lord Gisborough transferred control of the priory to the Office of Works. It later became the responsibility of the Ministry of Works, then the Department of the Environment and finally English Heritage. " and this seems to be a great jump from the time of Henry VIII to the present time. I think that readers are more interested in historical texts if they can see a link to the present time, but that your jump to 1932 is quite a big one.


 * The paragraph about the alum legacy IS a very tangible one, in that it shows the branch of events which occured because of the closure of the priory. The discovery of alum and England's success in trade were directly related. The Chaloner family - even though Thomas Chaloner, 2nd Baron Gisborough, and the present Lord Gisborough, Richard Chaloner, 3rd Baron Gisborough, are not directly from the line that was granted the land of the priory, they are direcly related to the alum legacy of the dissolution of Gisborough Priory. So too, is the establishment of the Potash mine at Boulby, in that the minerals that were first used to fix dyes in wool are now used for other uses.


 * So, in summary, it is to link the events of the dissolution to the present that I have included this information.


 * Best wishes Francis Hannaway (talk)Francis Hannaway 09:13, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs opened
An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs/Evidence. Please add your evidence by, 2011, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, NW ( Talk ) 23:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Icelandic Phallological Museum
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Gisborough Priory
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Guillaume Rondelet
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:04, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

La coupole
I reformatted the references of La Coupole as you kindly requested. --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 07:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

A pie for you!

 * I'll have a look and see what I can dig up. I'm a bit surprised nobody has written an article about CSG before given how eye-catching it is! Prioryman (talk) 00:43, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * And great work on Murder of Julia Martha Thomas too. Certainly as GA nomination there. Span (talk) 00:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it's actually up for featured article status at the moment at Featured article candidates/Murder of Julia Martha Thomas/archive1‎. Feel free to chip in to the discussion! Prioryman (talk) 00:51, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Article
Hello! Your submission of Article at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath Central Saint Giles and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gamaliel (talk) 21:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Whorlton Castle
Gatoclass (talk) 08:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

SEO experiment
Thank you for carrying out the wikibombing experiment. Very interesting result, and hopefully of a kind that can soothe people's fears and make all editors more relaxed. Apologies if I was ignorant or WP:DICKish on the experiment talk page. ☯.Zen Swashbuckler  .☠  19:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't for a moment think you were ignorant or dickish, so there's no need to apologise. Thanks for your feedback. Prioryman (talk) 22:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Message
00:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Diktator 17
this album is notable as it was released by JDub Records, a notible indie label with 9 years of history. and other than the Gangsta Rabbi has produced Matisyahu, balkan beat box,girls in trouble, etc. Diktator 17 was the first digital release on the label. the release was reviewed and mentioned in reputable 3rd party articles, which i will cite and make a complete article of this, but not all that work till i know no deletion.

613codify (talk) 01:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Please check article now to see if the issues were taken care of. thanks 613codify (talk) 17:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK nom for Ratón
Hi Prioryman, I have reviewed your nomination for "the mouse" at Template:Did you know nominations/Ratón and there are a couple ALTs I'd like to suggest. Could you see my comments at the nomination page? Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Your evidence for Cirt/Jayen
Hello Prioryman, I'm contacting you about the evidence you posted for the Cirt/Jayen Arbitration case. The scope for this case has been restricted solely to the conduct of Cirt and Jayen466; as such, any evidence presented should focus on the actions of those two editors. The only exception would be detailing actions of other users that provide necessary background information (such as "Cirt/Jayen did this because Other Editor was harassing them in this manner as shown in diff diff diff"). I don't see that this is what you were attempting to assert here, however. If you believe that DC needs to be sanctioned for these actions, then the relevant evidence should be provided at the Manipulation of BLP's case, and removed from Cirt/Jayen. If you have any questions, please let me know. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If I do that, I won't have enough room to rebut Cla68's charges against me. 500 words doesn't go far. What do you advise? Prioryman (talk) 23:15, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Central Saint Giles ‎
r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Prioryman (talk) 20:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Please don't post on my talkpage ever again. that is... ever. as in never again. thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 20:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Then don't make personal attacks on other editors. You don't have an exemption from WP:NPA. Prioryman (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * If you don't like it report it. Just do not darken my talkpage ever again. Off2riorob (talk) 20:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Fine. Just remember the rules, please. Prioryman (talk) 20:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You like your false statements - There are no rules here only common sense and good faith - you have currently lost any right to good faith imo. An if you considered common sense - you would do the correct thing and ask for unvanishing and stand up for your contribution history. Off2riorob (talk) 20:18, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Ratón
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Bravo - worth two ears and the tail! I really liked Central Saint Giles too - keep up the good work, please. Warden (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed those articles. Your kind words are appreciated. Prioryman (talk) 19:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Evidence
There is some discussion in the RFCU talk page. His contribution list led him to be called an SPA in 2009. His earliest editing was almost all to Osho-related articles, and he made his POV perfectly clear.  Will Beback   talk    01:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll have to look up Osho, never heard of it before... Prioryman (talk) 07:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Garrick's Temple to Shakespeare
Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Ekaterina Mikhailova-Demina
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for List of deaths at the Berlin Wall
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   07:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Leg cross
Hello Prioryman. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Leg cross, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Also all the Romanian football players are not eligable, as there is importance asserted in the infobox, they are however eligable for WP:BLPPROD, which will result in deletion after 10 days, provided the editor adds a reference, he might have been creating them to expand later (or not), in which case, speedy deletion doesn't help. --kelapstick(bainuu) 14:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manipulation of BLPs closed
An arbitration case regarding of Manipulation BLPs has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
 * 1) Editors who edit biographies of living persons and other articles referring to living persons are reminded that all editing of these articles must comply with the biographies of living persons policy and with the principles set forth in this decision;
 * 2) Administrators and other experienced editors are urged to take a proactive approach in addressing violations and alleged violations of the BLP policy, and to watchlist the BLP noticeboard and participate in discussing and resolving issues raised on that noticeboard;
 * 3) To the extent that parties to this case have been engaged in protracted disputes and quarrels with other parties, the feuding parties are urged to avoid any unnecessary interactions with each other, except to the extent necessary for legitimate purposes such as dispute resolution;
 * 4) If disputes concerning editing of biographical articles by parties to this case persist, appropriate dispute resolution methods should be pursued. To the extent possible, such dispute resolution should be led and addressed by editors who have not previously been involved in the disputes. If a specific serious dispute persists and other means of dispute resolution do not resolve them, a new and specifically focused request for arbitration may be filed not less than 30 days from the date of this decision.

For the Arbitration Committee, Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 15:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)