User talk:Prisonbreaky

AmIAnnoying.com

 * I said: "is this site even noteworthy? its wikipedia page reads like an advertisment and has no references (let alone ones that pass WP:V)"
 * you said: "The site HAS a wikipedia page, that follows the guidelines"

What guidelines does it follow? It reads like a buisness biography that the people who run the site would likely post. It features no reliable third party sources to prove it is noteworthy. It doesn't even have references to the material from the site itself - in fact, there isn't even a References section on the page. Where does the information posted on the page come from? If all of the information is from that single CNN article at the bottom, then it is not correctly cited. And that single CNN article doesn't exactly fit the bill on proving noteablity either - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor is it a soapbox. Lastly, the info you were inserting on the Star Jones page was not correctly cited either - leaving it open for removal. Biographies of living persons has to meet a greater standard than other articles. Cigraphix (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)