User talk:PrisonerofAskaban

May 2016
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Belarusian Gothic has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 19:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Border Terrier
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! SilverplateDelta (talk) 19:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Border Terrier. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Border Terrier was changed by PrisonerofAskaban (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962596 on 2016-05-19T19:58:43+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Border Terrier with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 21:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)