User talk:Privatechef

Welcome!

Hello, Privatechef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for LinkedIn. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Steven Walling 02:12, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Intel, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:22, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Removal of deadlinks and redlinks
You seem to be doing a lot of this, but it is not necessarily a good thing to do. We do not remove references just because the hyperlink has gone dead. The reference remains the source of the information, whether or not it can be accessed online, and in many cases it has simply been moved to another location, or can be recovered from an archive. Future editors may need this information to find the souce. You especially should not do this for printed sources, as you did here for example. Printed material can still be found in libraries.

Redlinks should not be removed just because they are redlinks, as you did here. Redlinks should only be removed if the subject is never likely to have an article. That is, if it is non-notable. SpinningSpark 00:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Spinningspark, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I was unaware of these guidelines and will be mindful of removing deadlinks and redlinks moving forward.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revathi Advaithi (June 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Revathi Advaithi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Revathi Advaithi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Revathi_Advaithi Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Revathi_Advaithi reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 00:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Manual of style
Hi - I'm Girth Summit, an administrator here. I noticed a recent edit summary of yours that indicated that you were changing text to make it compliant with the AP style guide. I haven't looked at the edit in detail, but I wanted to make you aware that we follow our own manual of style, not any third party style guides. I'm not saying that your changes were incorrect, just making sure that you understand what we are aiming for. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  18:25, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * As an afterthought, having looked at a few more of your edit summaries, you may wish to be aware that the Oxford comma is permitted here. They aren't required - it boils down to whether or not they're used consistently throughout an article. You shouldn't remove them on sight, you should check to see whether they are used throughout - don't just change them because you don't like them. See MOS:OXFORD for discussion of this. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  18:32, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Girth! This is super helpful and something that I will keep in mind moving forward when editing the pages. Appreciate you looking out! Privatechef (talk) 18:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries. The MOS is a vast, sprawling guide, but you can usually find guidance on what you want to know by searching for it. Give me a shout if you need any help; there's also WP:GOCE, which you might be interested in. Girth Summit  (blether)  18:37, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah - I just looked, MOS:US seems to say that the abbreviation is fine. Girth Summit  (blether)  18:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

OLINK
As an extension to the above, and noting again that Wikipedia's manual of style is less-than-succinct, you may want to take a quick look at the MOS:OL guideline. Which confirms that linking of large geographical topics (countries like the United States or continents like North America) are "usually not linked". Except in those (often less common) cases where the linked topic is of particular relevance to the context in the article. (Like "The United States of America [..] is a country primarily located in North America... Guliolopez (talk) 20:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ESET, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)