User talk:Privatesoul222

Welcome!
Hello, Privatesoul222, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as No Woman, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lithorien (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of No Woman


The article No Woman has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable non-notable short film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lithorien (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of No Woman


The article No Woman has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Un-notable film, with only IMDB ref.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —azuki (talk · contribs · email) 00:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of No Woman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article No Woman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/No Woman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lithorien (talk) 02:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yama rauf


A tag has been placed on Yama rauf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://hnmag.ca/festivals/women-food-and-zombies-in-east-van-short-films/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sjö (talk) 08:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of No Woman


A tag has been placed on No Woman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  14:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of No Woman


A tag has been placed on No Woman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  15:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Advice
Once an article has been deleted after a deletion discussion such as Articles for deletion/No Woman, you should not simply keep posting it again and again.

Since your latest version had a new reference, I have not speedy-deleted it, but "Userfied" it - moved into your "user space" at User:Privatesoul222/No Woman, where you can work on it. In my opinion, it is not ready for the encyclopedia, and if posted again and nominated for deletion, it would probably be deleted again. The "notability" standard for films is explained at WP:Notability (films). Just being nominated at a festival, among many others, does not count for much, and it seems that "Rogue Films" will review anything that is sent to them, which reduces the value of that source.

If you think you have overcome the reasons for deletion, you should first ask the administrator who closed the discussion, in this case ; if he does not agree, you can appeal at WP:Deletion review.

I see that on the deleted talk page you wrote "The article you deleted before was a complete one so I don't have that now". I will email a copy to you. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest?
Do you have any connection with the maker of the film? It seems to be the only topic on which you are interested in editing the encyclopedia. Please be aware of WP:COI if you are connected with the film in any way. Thanks. Pam D  13:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Bad editing
You edit here was so badly formatted and confusing that another editor reverted it. For some reason I chose to spend my time tidying it up. But in future please take the trouble to learn how to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. If you won't take that trouble, please don't damage the encyclopedia any more by adding confusing and badly formatted material. In particular we never use heading level 1 (with just a single ), and we don't SHOUT IN CAPITALS. Pam D  09:21, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Yama Rauf for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yama Rauf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yama Rauf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)