User talk:Priyanka2887

Your submission at Articles for creation: MarkPlus (May 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MarkPlus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  05:16, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Priyanka2887 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Priyanka2887 (talk) 06:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC) please help review my article titled MarkPlus. This is about an Indonesian consulting company which was a pioneer in the field of marketing in Indonesia. I have already edited the draft based on the comments received from first review. Can a Wikipedia editor review again? Thanks.

Priyanka2887 (talk) 06:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MarkPlus (May 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MarkPlus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Help me!
I have been asked to write this article on Wikipedia about my employer (MarkPlus). Even though I am well aware that promotional material should not go on Wikipedia, I really objectively feel this company deserves a Wikipedia page. MarkPlus has been one of the pioneers in advancing the discipline of marketing in Indonesia. They have an interesting story too and is one of the few companies competing head on with big multinational consulting companies in Indonesia. I am not saying it only because I am supposed to do this, but I really believe it.

Please help me with tips on how to make this article about the company more notable, neutral and objective. I have tried to do this by including minimal information about the company but more about the knowledge-based concepts they have come up with over the years, as well as some of the international best-selling books authored by the company's founder.

Consider it a polite disclaimer and please help. Any help is appreciated.

Priyanka2887 (talk) 08:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * As pointed out above, it's imperative that you demonstrate why the company is notable by providing third-party reliable sources. You only provide sources by people affiliated with the company, not by others, which is not enough. People also don't want to read about your methods or things like that (unless they are notable as well). You might want to read some featured articles of companies to understand what an article should ideally look like. Regards  So Why  11:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MarkPlus (June 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MarkPlus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chenzw   Talk   05:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While well-sourced, objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister  talk  13:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:MarkPlus has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:MarkPlus. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)