User talk:Pro Game Master87

Image:WWEECWONS07.jpg
Sorry I put the speedy deletion tag on the image, I was meant to put it on something else!! Sorry again. Davnel03 11:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi there
Hey - I'm just letting you know that an administrator, alphachimp, has deleted and restored your userpage in order to remove the personal details of minors that were on it (and remove them from the page history). It's generally not a good idea to divulge full names and dates of birth of children on your userpage because, on a site as popular as Wikipedia, lots of people could view your page and there is a small potential that this could have dangerous consequences. It's always better to be safe than sorry. Regards and sorry if this has caused you any inconvenience. Will (aka Wimt ) 09:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay that's fine. I don't even care if the administrators take something off my user page. I'll just be waiting if my request for adminship is accepted or not. Pro Game Master87 22:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Paddy Daly
Can I ask why you reverted the edit to this article please? It looks ok to me. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 303 10:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I have found out it was vandalism so I have reverted it Pro Game Master87 10:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Pardon? Can you please explain what makes you think it was vandalism? One Night In Hackney 303 10:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Here:

'''leading the unsuccessful attempt to destroy the Magazine Fort in the Phoenix Park. He was later wounded in the particularly vicious fighting near the Linenhall. He was subsequently'''

I have realized that it was unhelpful so I had no choice Pro Game Master87 10:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Please assume good faith, even with anonymous editors. See number 10 on this site, there's a Magazine Fort in the Phoenix Park. See here for details on the Linenhall. Your claim of vandalism is incorrect, if you lack the knowledge to determine whether an edit is vandalism or not, assume good faith. One Night In Hackney 303 10:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... alright I see sorry about it Pro Game Master87 10:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. There's plenty of edits that are obvious vandalism, and that one wasn't obvious so please don't bite anonymous editors. Plenty of people who have an interest in particular articles will have them watchlisted, and will sort out anything that needs knowledge of an article. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 303 10:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Okay. Because almost every single unregistered users prevent vandalism here so I always look into their edits in the recent changes Pro Game Master87 10:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand that, and it's a job that needs doing. But don't automatically think every edit is vandalism, there are many constructive IP editors, and that IP is a dynamic IP anyway so it's likely someone who has been editing for a while but with different IPs. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 303 10:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Okay. I've gotta go so see ya. I'll reply back anytime in your talk page when I need anything to talk or whatever. Pro Game Master87 10:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

User:Axe Ghost
Are you seriously asking me about something from October 2006 which you could have easily, and I do mean easily since this user has a grand total of 13 edits? It's right here. Calling other uses dufuses [sic] and dickheads because they disagree with his spelling of something is a personal attack.«»bd(talk stalk) 14:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

So who is he referring to as a personal attack? Pro Game Master87 03:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

That would be the person who made the edit. He may not have known who it was, but he was still singling someone out. If you want to reply, then I suggest emailing me, as I'm not on very often anymore. Peace, The Hybrid 04:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Fansite
I removed the link because the current consensus among editors is to have only the top three fansites linked as the four or five next biggest don't come close to them. See discussion on the talk page and in talk archive 20. C omrade   T  ux  01:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Red Hot Chili Peppers logo
I've removed the logo. It wasn't criticised in the article (there's a criteria for an fair use image to be included in an article). Also, it made the name of the band much harder to read, in a place where it should be obvious what the band's name is. CloudNine 07:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RHCPlogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:RHCPlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CloudNine 07:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: A question about VP
Please be patient. You will be approved eventualy. ffm ✎ talk  19:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Dear Pro Game Master87,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.  Daniel  06:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

As a matter of fact I am.
TheBlazikenMaster 12:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Antiunblocktrolling.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)