User talk:Procession

Per Requests for checkuser/Case/Lukeklein, I've blocked this account from editing indefinitely. Sorry. – Luna Santin  (talk) 09:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I was in the process of writing my own decline, and I conflicted with Hersfold above. Here was the text of my decline:  Per several arbitration committee cases, the recruitment of new people for the sole purpose of influincing a debate are to be treated exactly as if it were one person who were operating multiple accounts with the intent to deceive. See WP:SOCK and this ArbCom finding on "Meatpuppets" for more information on this. In short, whether you are the same person as Lukeklein or you are his roomate who he asked to vote in the discussion in question, its all the same to Wikipedia. A new account was clearly created at the behest of Lukeklein for the sole purpose of influincing the outcome of a debate unfairly, and for that reason this new account has been blocked. — Jayron32. talk . contribs  22:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)}}

.

Looks like you've been unblocked, at this point; my apologies for the misunderstanding. – Luna Santin  (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)