User talk:ProdigyBrand

September 2021
Hello ProdigyBrand. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Julian Newman, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ProdigyBrand. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Kuru  (talk)  13:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello
 * The only edits that have been made is Julian Newmans high school senior year and all time stats that are well publicized by every media outlet but somehow left out of his Wikipedia. Media outlets Overtime, Elitemixtapes, Ball is life, Maxpreps,
 * USA Today all confirm his stats that were left out and now are correct and updated  ProdigyBrand (talk) 20:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Great - provide direct links to those sources on the article's talk page. Do not edit the article again until you've fully sourced this material. Just stating the name of a site, which does not appear to have anything that supports all of those claims, is not sufficient. I'm sorry, but given the promotional name of this account, the promotional nature of your edits, and the unsourced material being added to a WP:BLP, this account will be blocked if you do any of that again. Use the talk page to prove your claims. Kuru   (talk)  21:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)