User talk:ProfNDame

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, ProfNDame. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Devra Davis. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Devra Davis, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 23:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 00:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Devra Davis) for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Important notice
Removing unsourced or poorly sourced material is fine (WP:BLP); adding new material without sources is not. If you have a connection to the article subject, please read, and/or tell the person to read, WP:FAQ/Article subjects. If you continue to add unverifiable statements, or re-add challenged statements without an inline citation directly supporting the material, you may be topic banned from editing biographical articles about living people, and you may be blocked from editing, without an expiration date and without further warning. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)