User talk:Profb21

Monash Asia Institute
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Monash Asia Institute, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 13:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello Profb21, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:


 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Where to ask a question, try the Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up!

--Recurring dreams 06:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Attack
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. CSDWarnBot 13:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Monash University Malaysia Students Association
Monash University Malaysia Students Association, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Monash University Malaysia Students Association satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Monash University Malaysia Students Association and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Monash University Malaysia Students Association during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. → AA (talk) — 13:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Ross Ray"
A page you created, Ross Ray, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks.  « l | Ψrom3th3ăn ™ | l »   (talk) 08:05, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I declined the speedy deletion. But what does "QC" stand for. The link points to a  disambiguation page. Cheers,   Dloh  cierekim  14:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies
A tag has been placed on Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Indigenous Australians template on Ron Castan
Hi, Profb21. I removed the template you put on the article for Ron Castan. To my knowledge, such templates warning about content are not in accordance with standard Wikipedia policies. I moved the template to the articles talk page. If you feel strongly about this and wish to discuss it further, the talk page for the article Indigenous Australians is probably the best place to start. (WARNING: That article does in fact contain images that you may find distasteful.) Such a template should probably be "all or nothing". In other words, if one aboriginal article must use it, they all should. Such a change is big enough to require consensus before it is done. Jason Quinn (talk) 14:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Monash Association of Debaters
Hi there - this is a note to say that this article has been nominated for deletion here. Cheers --Mkativerata (talk) 06:49, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Monash UNI infobox
I see you have added an infobox. I wonder where you got the idea... Spagettilord69 (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Lucy Kiraly
I noticed that last year you deleted the entry for Lucy Kiraly, claiming that she was not notable. She was once a leading Melbourne model. Her photograph appears on the Monash Archives site when she graduated, and she was the first "barrel girl" on Tattslotto on Melbourne television. I can't give a reference but a Tattersalls executive told me she was largely responsible for the early success of Tattslotto, as people watched the draw on television to admire her good looks. She is very notable. When I went to school many years ago a teacher claimed an essay I wrote about a leading jockey was about a non-notable. No doubt he would claim the same thing for models. Jockeys are notable on Wikipedia. So should top models be notable. Ms Kiraly now runs a leading Victorian model agency. She is very notable.Pestbuda (talk) 07:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bill Charman


A tag has been placed on Bill Charman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.monash.edu.au/pharm/research/researchers/profile.html?sid=2144&pid=5512. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jytdog (talk) 10:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fiona Balfour


The article Fiona Balfour has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails the WP:GNG – no evidence to suggest she is more notable than any other company director.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  15:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bill Charman


The article Bill Charman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)