User talk:ProfessorKLK

I am a direct descendant of Rav Nachman, via my father's maternal line of Talmudic scholars and rabbis going back in time, and I am alarmed by the insensitive and scanty, non-scholarly entries made about my ancestor, who was actually a descendant of King David, in the line with Hillel and Rashi. The citing is totally lacking this information, and so much other detail from documentation, as well as the fact it was the line of David, a royal Jewish line, and that it was Cohane, of the priests of Judaism. Where are the documents and citings that are legitimate? My ancestors were BEN RAV NACHMAN, which in anachronism was B-A-R-O-N, as was my grandmother's maiden surname. She was very proud of her heritage, which was traceable through rabbinical genealogical recordings. Although documents have been destroyed by the Nazis and their collaborators during WWII and by others, prior, in suspicious and deliberate fires, documentation about Rav Nachman exist in Israel. I am not Orthodox, but I am alarmed by the shoddy quality of the entry thus far. I don't have time for entries. I am not going to use this site for entries though, based on the slipshod approach to rewriting history. It is unethical of people making entries about things in which they are not scholars. The Sunday Morning program on CBS, this Sunday, December 10, 2006 pointed this fact out for millions of viewers today. I prefer a legitimate encyclopedia prepared by experts and scholars who are not biased and who are not rewriting history.