User talk:ProfessorTrolling

Welcome!
Hello, ProfessorTrolling, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Michael Mayhem, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained. (ProfTrolling: Uh, ok?)

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! (ProfTrolling: I am) Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 172.56.42.202 (talk) 04:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Mayhem


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Michael Mayhem, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 172.56.42.202 (talk) 04:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm JudgeRM. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Providence (religious movement) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JudgeRM  (talk to me)  03:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Providence (religious movement), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

ProfessorTrolling (talk) 03:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)I used MY account for only telling the truth, people. That's what this is about, right? The truth.


 * Nope, we don't want your "truth." We only take neutral summaries of professionally published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, not crap you made up as a joke (like Michael Mayhem), not threats (as here), not censorship (as here), not spamming sermons (as here).  Ian.thomson (talk) 03:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

ProfessorTrolling (talk) 03:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC) Oh, well. I guess I shoud've done sandbox. Bye Wikipedia.???? And wait what? Oh michael mayhem. I get that you guys might be... PISSED off or something. Sad, but then again a was being very annoying. Again sorry guys!! Gosh! ProfessorTrolling (talk) 03:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC) Oh yeah, I'm a new accout. Didnt know much rules, so I thot "wow, free webpage of an imagineary me!! YAY!!!" Nope, nope, nope. I was screwed. Full of people who dont like my articles.... Trolol, I should used sandbox and stayed put.


 * Nope, we're not pissed. Maybe you're projecting? Ah well, doesn't matter, just like your apologies. This is business as usual for us. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Talk page access revoked, then. No rational adult would think trolls would be welcome here. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)