User talk:Professor Penguino/Archive 1

October 2022
Hi Professor Penguino! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Aaron Maté several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kleinpecan (talk) 01:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @Kleinpecan. Thank you for taking the time to write to me. The article was biased and unfair to Aaron Mate. I was in no way trying to start an edit war. This is actually the first time I have edited or even attempted to edit the Aaron Mate page. It is important for Wikipedia to be objective, fair, and balanced--and back up claims with objectively proven facts and citations. If I have time, I will bring it up on the Talk Page.
 * Sincerely, Fellow Wikipedian, Professor Penguino (talk) 01:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The problem is that the phrase award-winning is puffery. His awards are already listed in the article. Kleinpecan (talk) 01:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, then why is "fringe" included in the introduction? The word "fringe" is very prejudicial. Whereas "award-winning" is just a simple fact--not puffery--to balance out the negative biased word "fringe." Professor Penguino (talk) 01:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia defines Puffery as, "exaggerated or false praise." To say that Aaron Mate is an "award winning Canadian journalist" is neither false, nor exaggerated. It is simply a fact. Professor Penguino (talk) 01:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * As per MOS:PUFFERY, those are "words [that] are often used without attribution to promote the subject of an article, while neither imparting nor plainly summarizing verifiable information".
 * As per WP:NPOV, Wikipedia articles should represent "fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." If reliable sources are primarily negative, so will be the Wikipedia article. There is no requirement to engage in false balance and balance articles out. Kleinpecan (talk) 02:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1.) The fact that Mate is "award-winning" *is* attributed--I included a citation. Indeed, it is indisputable. 2.) It is not in fact "puffery" because it is easily verifiable that he won the Izzy Award. 3.) By your own logic, you are inconsistent as other journalists are referred to as "award-winning" and you have no problem using the word "fringe," which is a negative prejudicial put-down. 4.) In any case, I propose as a compromise that Wikipedia move the fact that Mate won the IZZY Award from the first sentence of the introduction to the last sentence of the intro. You can look up many award-winning journalists on Wikipedia--the fact that they won awards is always prominently featured in the first introductory paragraph, often in the last sentence of the introduction. Professor Penguino (talk) 03:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Again, I really appreciate your feedback. I love Wikipedia. Professor Penguino (talk) 01:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm EchidnaLives. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. echidnaLives (talk) 01:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, EchidnaLives. The quote is as cited in Joy Hakim's 2005 book The First Americans: Prehistory - 1600 Chapter 22, Page 110. I was actually in the midst of writing a citation when my edits were suddenly reverted before I had a chance to add the citation. Professor Penguino (talk) 01:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Professor Penguino, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Belt and Road Initiative did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Introduction to referencing
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Kautilya3 (talk) 06:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:008000


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:008000, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Re:Talkpage comments
Wikipedia is not a place to WP:SOAPBOX. If people want to rant about Wikipedia being "NATO propaganda", they can do so elsewhere. Hemiauchenia (talk) 13:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Cheezypeaz (talk) 00:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Excuse me, do you know, a user who edited your userpage and you seemed completely fine with that? — Nythar  (💬-🎃) 02:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do. Why do you ask? Professor Penguino (talk) 02:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Why not ask? Some people like to join Wikipedia in small groups to work on certain projects, but I find it a bit strange when multiple accounts edit with the behavior of experienced users. was also somewhat confused by this, as can be seen here: User talk:Pax Wikipedian. —  Nythar  (💬-🎃) 02:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

RFPP requests
Please stop making protection requests until you understand our protection policy. This one in particular is silly and a waste of admin time. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hi. I am just letting you know that I am not trying to edit war. I put an explanation for my edit that you reverted. Figure it would help clarify why I made that change. CartoonnewsCP (talk) 22:45, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I understand now. Thank you for your clarification. Have a nice day! Professor Penguino (talk) 22:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Spacing
Hello, and thanks for your contributions. Although I admire your enthusiasm, please don't edit articles just to remove spaces from line ends or to turn double spaces into single ones. Double spacing is one valid way to separate sentences, and is the norm in some countries such as the UK. Changing the spacing has no effect on the displayed page, and simply clutters the edit history. Wikipedia has many more important errors to be fixed. Thanks again, Certes (talk) 09:18, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Bolivia and ANI
Hey, thanks for noticing the issue on the Bolivia article. You're right, Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents is the wrong place to post about that (usually). A more appropriate forum is WP:TEAHOUSE, where there's almost always someone willing to help. However, a nifty trick to help fix the issue yourself is to enable Twinkle. Twinkle actually has a function that allows you to find a stable prior version of an article and restore that version in a single click (as I did on Bolivia). Again, thanks for noticing the issue and don't feel like you did something wrong by posting to ANI; just the wrong spot! ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:33, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, Pbritti! Thank you for fixing the Bolivia page! Next time I'll go to the Teahouse for help. I'll definitely try installing Twinkle. Sincerely, Fellow Wikipedian, Professor Penguino (talk) 02:06, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Gubble
hi, on what basis did you re-revert my edit of Gubble just now? I replaced an incorrect developer credit for the PlayStation version (crediting the US publisher of the game as the developer) with one referenced to GDRI which is a well-regarded source among game historians, had it reverted by a bot in what appeared to be a false positive, and as per the message left by the bot on my talk page, I reported the false positive and redid the edit only to find it reverted again by you with no explanation 81.101.170.185 (talk) 21:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The revert was actually an accident, so I am sorry about that. I have just reverted my revert, so your revision is now in place again. Regards, Professor Penguino (talk) 21:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas


CAPTAIN RAJU (T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much, Captain Raju! A Merry Christmas to you as well! Professor Penguino (talk) 23:57, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year

 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

January 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Freedom Caucus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please, get consensus before reinstating challenged changes. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 05:17, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Vandalism? No. I reverted to the last stable revision and fixed a citation. Since the 1RR is in place on the article, I'm going to let this go. But vandalism is serious. I spend half of my time on Wikipedia reverting vandalism. Try not to accuse good-faith editors of being vandals next time.
 * Sincerely, Professor Penguino (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection of this page
Do you want me to semi-protect this page? PhilKnight (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes please! Thank you so much! Professor Penguino (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * This IP keeps harassing me and wearing me down. I would really appreciate it. Professor Penguino (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)


 * ✅. PhilKnight (talk) 22:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Professor Penguino (talk) 22:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Luci (character)
Hello, Professor Penguino. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luci (character), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Dang. Professor Penguino (talk) 21:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

WP:NOTWALLOFSHAME
Please read WP:NOTWALLOFSHAME before removing re-adding warnings from user talk pages. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I removed warnings from a talk page? When? Professor Penguino (talk) 20:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, misword there. I meant re-add warnings to a talk page. See WP:NOTWALLOFSHAME. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 21:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes. Sorry about that. A bad decision on my part. Professor Penguino (talk) 21:19, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No need to apologize, just a note for next time. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 21:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. Professor Penguino (talk) 21:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Study Invite
Hello, thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for recent change patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Sure. Sounds cool. Professor Penguino (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I may not be able to participate right now. Thank you very much for the offer though. Good luck. Professor Penguino (talk) 04:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries, thanks for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 19:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Good luck. Professor Penguino (talk) 21:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Bonacci (June 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Bonacci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Jim_Bonacci Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RPSkokie&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jim_Bonacci reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 07:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Book
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Book, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Professor_Penguino&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1166220268 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Book&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1166220268%7CBook%5D%5D Ask for help])

Teahouse host
Dear Professor Penguino, Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host: Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts. My apologies for the extremely belated welcome! You've made 52 useful contributions to the Teahouse thus far.
 * Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
 * templates to use and, of course:
 * the question forum itself.

Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 20:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Red Bank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DK. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

1777 in Russia moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to 1777 in Russia. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is an empty list. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. StartOkayStop (talk) 05:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks for notifying me. Have a good one! Professor Penguino (talk) 05:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walt Woodward (September 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walt Woodward and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Walt_Woodward Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Utopes&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Walt_Woodward reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes (talk / cont) 23:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the feedback! I'll try adding more independent, reliable, secondary sources! Professor Penguino (talk) 01:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walt Woodward (September 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walt Woodward and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Walt_Woodward Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CNMall41&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Walt_Woodward reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1777 in Russia (September 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1777 in Russia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:1777_in_Russia Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1777_in_Russia reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Hello  and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
 * If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Professor Penguino/subpage/ What is "Overlinking?"
Hi Professor Penguino! This userspace essay has a space at the start of its title, causing it to be sorted at the top of, rather than under W. Would you object if the page was moved to remove the space (or alternatively, a DEFAULTSORT magic word added)?

All the best, user: A smart kitten meow 11:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I would not mind. Thank you very much for asking! Professor Penguino (talk) 18:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem :) user: A smart kitten meow 18:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Black Sea Fleet HQ missile strike (September 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Black Sea Fleet HQ missile strike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:2023_Black_Sea_Fleet_HQ_missile_strike Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:2023_Black_Sea_Fleet_HQ_missile_strike reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 16:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2023 missile strike on the Sevastopol Naval Base
Hello! Your submission of 2023 missile strike on the Sevastopol Naval Base at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Specifically, there's a paragraph that needs citations. I've marked it in the article.3family6 (<u style="color:black">Talk to me &#124; <small style="color:purple">See what I have done ) 14:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey, I saw that there was a problem with the source I added. Is it a formatting thing, or a problem with the source itself? Professor Penguino (talk) 23:23, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, LOL now I got what you were saying. Ok, I'll try looking for those citations right away. Thanks. Professor Penguino (talk) 23:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅. Unsourced material was wither removed or sourced. You can check back over it again when you get a chance. :) Professor Penguino (talk) 01:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

For Future Reference
You can close a discussion you started if you are withdrawing your idea. I went ahead and did it for you procedurally. :) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 00:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh, thanks!! Professor Penguino (talk) 01:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Welp - my close got reverted. I presume what I said applies outside of the idea lab. Anyway have a good day! Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 04:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Aw, that's too bad. Have a good one! Professor Penguino (talk) 04:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

+rollback
Hi Professor Penguino,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
 * Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
 * Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like " " or " " is helpful.
 * Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
 * If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! This will help me a lot fighting vandalism. Have a good one. Professor Penguino (talk) 20:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Drafts
Hi Professor Penguino. Just a head up that there's no requirement to use draftspace for confirmed editors without a COI. Please try to avoid implying otherwise. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I didn’t imply it was required. I didn’t move the editor’s article back to draft space or something like that. If I am not mistaken, it is preferring if editors start a draft before creating a stub article. It was simply because the article was pretty much a stub that hadn’t gone through the process of review. That’s all.
 * Have a good one. Professor Penguino (talk) 20:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1777 in Russia (October 18)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1777 in Russia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:1777_in_Russia Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Johannes_Maximilian&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1777_in_Russia reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Sophia and jayne.jpg and WP:NFCC/WP:NFC
You recently added this image to the Jayne Mansfield article. Please be aware that per WP:NFCC #10c, every use of a non-free image such as this one must have a valid rationale. Also be aware that per WP:NFC #6, the use of a non-free image outside of a dedicated article about that image is generally not permitted. This image has a dedicated article at Jayne Mansfield–Sophia Loren photo and thus no valid rationale can be created for its use on the Jayne Mansfield article. I've removed the image from the usage on Jayne Mansfield. If you have questions, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 12:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh, thanks! Professor Penguino (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)