User talk:Professor Profession

Nomination of Garchomp Evolution Line for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garchomp Evolution Line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Garchomp Evolution Line until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 22:34, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pseudo-Legendary Pokémon


The article Pseudo-Legendary Pokémon has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a subject suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia, as it is purely about a fictional work and is better suited for a fansite. WP:IINFO, WP:NOTGUIDE."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 23:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Pseudo-Legendary Pokémon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pseudo-Legendary Pokémon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pseudo-Legendary Pokémon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 16:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, Professor Profession, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Bradv 🍁  21:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)