User talk:Profg/Archive

I'd suggest actually reading the link first. Never have I seen so much consensus for a ban. Adam Cuerden talk 20:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes indeed, and Adam has also received awards in appreciation for taking control and saving Wikipedia a lot of trouble. -- Fyslee / talk 20:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

AGREE to Unblock Proposal
Since I cannot edit anywhere except here, I hereby AGREE to B's and BlueMoonlet's proposal here to be place on "civility parole and a 1RR restriction".

I would also like to take this opportunity to ask B and BlueMoonlet to monitor all of my activities and interactions with others, especially with those who brought and fought for the charges resulting in the indef block, with the purpose of giving me warning, instruction, and (in general) mentoring me along the way here at Wikipedia. I admire your fairness in contributing to the WP project, and would appreciate your assistance here.

CC'ing to B's and BlueMoonlet's email.

Thank you. --profg Talk 20:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Here is the formal text of the "civility parole and 1RR restriction" (borrowed from previous WP:RFARB cases):
 * is subject to a comprehensive editing restriction for six months. He limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. If he exceeds this limit, fails to discuss a content reversion, or makes any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked.
 * I am going to write an explanation at ANI, notify the blocking admin, then remove the block. Please use this opportunity to edit constructively, avoid controversy, avoid topics where you may have a conflict of interest, and not abuse the second chance. -- B 22:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I would like to add the following. I have no admin privileges, so this amounts to nothing more than advice:  1) I'm going to request some clarification on WP:STALK policy, but given your situation I think it's clear that you should refrain from checking other editors' contrib pages to "see what they're up to."  2) name-calling such as "obsessive", "POV pushing", and "POV-warrior" is PA and inappropriate.  I don't care if others are saying inappropriate things about you; don't do it.  --BlueMoonlet 06:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree. I admit to responding to quickly, and too strongly, when baited. I will be more careful in the future. Thank you for your advice.


 * One thing: I archived my Talk page because it's now incredibly cluttered. I dislike clutter immensely. :-) I archive in one of the manners described at Wp:archive, which I find to be the easiest. Would it be alright if I (or you, if you'd like) revert back to my recent archiving? Thanks. --profg Talk 06:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I was about to bring this up. Someone just protested at WP:ANI over your removal of the agreement box from your talk page, and I tend to agree that that needs to remain here for the duration of your probation.  More generally, I strongly urge you to use the subpage method rather than the permanent link method, as it makes your talk page much more transparent to others.  I would also encourage you to wait at least 24 hours for a thread to become cold before removing it from your main talk page.  --BlueMoonlet 06:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. --profg Talk 00:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)