User talk:Programming gecko

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Mike Christie (talk) 11:27, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Thanks! // Programming gecko ( talk ) 16:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism fighting
Haha beat me to the Suthmoon reverts :P Nimoranthu (talk) 03:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * =P Sorry about that; good to know other people are paying attention too, though. // Programming gecko ( talk ) 03:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Suspected
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Vimbo Gales (talk) 20:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Considering that I didn't add any content, but rather removed your uncited content (ie, the claim that the CIA carried out the bombings]]), I don't know what you're complaining about. // Programming gecko ( talk ) 20:23, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Its nothing personal, don't take it that way! --Vimbo Gales (talk) 20:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to April 2010 Baghdad bombings. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Vimbo Gales (talk) 20:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Please stop leaving warnings on my page telling me not to add uncited content. I have not added any uncited content; I am removing uncited content. // Programming gecko ( talk ) 20:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Contrary to your claim that "almost everything in the article is uncited", it is easy to see that the article is quite well referenced. As to "it is only suspected", that makes no difference. Find a reliable source that says that the Al-Qaeda in Iraq is "suspected" of carrying out the bombing and cite your addition.
 * It is quite easy to look in the article and see that those citations are already there. References #1 and 6 appear to cover that. // Programming gecko ( talk ) 20:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Article reads more like a tabloid than anything else. There are other points of views beside popular newspapers. --Vimbo Gales (talk) 20:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Vimbo Gales (talk) 20:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I am well aware of that, since I'm the one who STARTED the discussion. Please stop copying everything I put onto your talk page and putting it on mine. // Programming gecko ( talk ) 20:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for protecting the integrity of April 2010 Baghdad bombings. Vimbo Gales has been blocked for his non-sense.  Feel free to blank this entire section if you want since nothing said here by him was even remotely true. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Programming gecko!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 23:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)