User talk:Progresschrome

Image Tagging for Image:FortSevern.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FortSevern.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:FortSevernChurch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FortSevernChurch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Fraserdalemap.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Fraserdalemap.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:FortSevernWinter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FortSevernWinter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:SiouxLookout-Frontstreet.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SiouxLookout-Frontstreet.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Ambigous image permission
Hi, you have uploaded Image:Winterequinoxlivepressphoto1.jpg and tagged it with either No rights reserved or CopyrightedFreeUse, but the upload summary only says that the image is used with permission. Can you please clearify wether or not the copyright holder actualy explicitly said that anyone can use the image for any purpose (including commercial use)? Often people will give permission for something to be used on Wikipedia, but unfortunately this alone does not mean that it becomes free content (wich it needs to be in order for us to use it), so if all we have is the permission to use the image on Wikipedia we regretfully have to delete it unless we can justify it's use under our fair use policy. If you need to ask the copyright holder to clearify please read Requesting copyright permission first to make sure you ask for the right things.

Please look into this ASAP as I have tagged the image as "no licence" in the meantime, meaning it will get deleted in 7 days time unless the license is clearified. If you didn't get to read this before after the image was deleted don't worry; if you get the required copyright release "after the fact" we can always undelete the image. Just ask the deleting admin (check the deletion log) politely to do so, or post a undelete request at Deletion review along with the nessesary copyright info. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:North-eva-aariak-file.jpg
Please don't violate Wikipdia:Copyrights by taking images from other web sites. Continuing to do so will lead to blocking. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 23:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Crony Records


The article Crony Records has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet notability guidelines of either WP:CORP or WP:MUSIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  PK T (alk)  15:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I see that you've removed the  notice, which is fine - you're allowed to do that for a Proposed deletion. Please be aware that the article has been sent to the AfD process for review by other editors.  The discussion is here.   PK  T (alk)  14:26, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Brad Weber, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Specs112  t   c  13:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Brad-Angus-Perogies.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brad-Angus-Perogies.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:24, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

File:AlbertonOntario.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AlbertonOntario.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Vieque (talk • ctb) 04:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Tenth of may angus.jpg


The file File:Tenth of may angus.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused personal photo. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 05:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)