User talk:ProgressiveAsianDetroit

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Vincent Who?, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Vincent Who?
Thank you for your message, and I apologize for my delay in replying.

I understand your concerns about the article concerning your film and I would like to resolve the matter. This is the way the article looked before the other organization used it to promote their "Special Edition DVD". In accordance with Wikipedia's verifiability policy, every statement in the article is sourced to a neutral reliable source.

I would like to propose that we restore the article to the shorter version that was supported by independent sources. If there are important facts missing from the article, please let me know and I'll try to find sources for them.

Finally, your message said that the website listed as the film's "official" site is not, in fact, the official site. Is there another website that should be included instead, or should we omit mentioning the website?

I look forward to working with you to resolve this issue. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 08:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)