User talk:Progunicorns

List of bass guitarists
Hello. Your recent edit to List of bass guitarists appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Inglorious, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Please note the person that keeps editing has also placed slander, homophobic comments and swear words on our page. We are the bands management that keeps correcting it as the person who is homophobic is being tracked for a sexist attack court case. Progunicorns (talk) 23:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Inglorious, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  15:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I’m GillPreston. I noticed that you are removing content that contains an accurate citation without a valid reason. Your content removal is not constructive and due to there being a valid citation, has been reverted. Thank you. GillPreston (talk) 15:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Inglorious. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 21:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * The /64 of Special:Contributions/2A00:23C8:8002:1D01:48BA:692B:45A9:D8BC was rangeblocked after the edit warring continued by IP. Binksternet (talk) 23:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)