User talk:Project2501a/Archive3

compu-lang-stub
I modified so at puts articles in Category:Programming languages and not in (illogical place) Category:Computer science. Any objections? Cheers, --R.Koot 21:02, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

computer science categorization
Would you be interested in finding out which computer (science) related categories there are and making some guidelines on using them. I find, for example, Category:Computer architecture and Category:Computer hardware to be ambiguous. An important case may be Category:Computer science, I have a very theoretical view on it. I would rather included Category:Programming languages as Computer science > Software engineering > Programming languages and only put the classical subjects as Algorithms and Data structures directly in it. --R.Koot 21:50, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Have you seen how Wiki Books is handling Computer Science?
 * Logical constructs do belong much more in software, not restricted to programs, for example, consider triggers on files ... a type of logical construct that uses no program, is part of the data base architecture.
 * However, there is an overlap with hardware, such as the role of special purpose, as opposed to general purpose, computers.

AlMac 21:59, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Note from Miskin
The following note appeared on User talk:Macrakis, but is addressed to you. --Macrakis 17:33, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Ki esy re ProjectXXX me to sumpathio adelfe alla mipos se exei faei i malakia? Se periptosi pou den to exeis katalabei, eisai eksisou karagkiozis me tous extremistes tis akrodeksias pou kathesai kai brizeis. Basika eisai ki esu o idios extremistis xoris na to katalabaineis. O sofos anthropos katigorei kai uperaspizetai ti xora tou analoga me tis sunthikes. To na kathesai apla na katigoreis tous Ellines editors stin wikipedia epeidi de sumfonoun me tis politikes sou pepithiseis, prokeitai gia malakinsi 1ou bathmou. Ante giati apo tote pou egine i aristera tis modas ntunontai oloi sta kokkina kai agourazoun kai prada. Miskin

:o
Well, at least it's not hashish - or meth! --Jpbrenna 00:20, 22 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Ah yes, I was actually introduced to rolling my own tobacco while in Greece. Rizla papers and Drum tobacco, I presume?  Both were very hard to find when I got back to America.


 * It tastes much better, in addition to being less expensive. Very bad for you in the long run though, which is why I've quit. --Jpbrenna 02:58, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Blackface
Gee, thanks. :) deeceevoice 15:42, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Dimitris .gif
This image was tagged as public domain, but it is probably copyright by the newspaper or the cartoonist (Dimitris Hantzopoulos - you should have also added his full name). Did you ask for permission? Adia 19:17, 2005 August 14 (UTC)
 * OK, but if you don't ask for permission and just ignore the copyright, you shouldn't say that the image is public domain... Maybe you could claim fair use, but I don't think this is the proper context. You should write an article about Dimitris Hantzopoulos and use it there as an illustration ;-) Adia 09:25, 2005 August 15 (UTC)
 * I'll see if I can create some articles (at least stubs) about greek cartoonists... Also I'll continue your translation of Nikolas Asimos into english, if you don't mind. (Θα πρέπει να αναγνωρίσεις ακόμα ένα πράγμα στην Ελλάδα εκτός από τον καιρό, τη θάλασσα και τη γελοιογραφία: τη μουσική μας.) About Malakas, I'm sorry but I think it does belong in Wiktionary. Adia 11:47, 2005 August 21 (UTC)

Destub of Malaka
It's going to be moved to Wiktionary if it's not expanded, and then your userpage will have even more redlines. Maybe you can quote some poetry that uses the word or something? --Jpbrenna 18:42, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

VfD/Wikiproject:Wikipedians for decency
In Soviet Russia, Wikipedia autofellates you!

I must say that's the funniest thing I've ever seen at a heated debate! Thank you so much! Redwolf24 07:36, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll second that. Delightful.  CanadianCaesar 08:39, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

For User:Danny
Η Βικιπαίδια χρειάζεται τη βοηθειά σας για να συγκεντρώσει US$200,000. Για λεπτομέριες, δείτε τη σχετική σελίδα μας.

Image:Dimitris .gif
Heya, on what grounds do you think Image:Dimitris .gif is public domain or fair use? It was listed WP:CP but as you're the only one using it and don't appear to have been informed, I'll wait a few days before closing it. --fvw *  22:32, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * I've deleted it, if you decide to reupload, please include a proper fair use rationale (though I strongly doubt there's a valid one for its use on user pages). --fvw *  21:38, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Science pearls
Hi,

Please notice the above project. As a mathematician, you might be especially interested in List of publications in mathematics

I’ll appreciate any help. Thank, APH 10:03, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Keetoowah Arbitration case
Hello,

The Arbitration case against Keetoowah that you contributed to has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Keetoowah. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Keetoowah/Evidence.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 19:24, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Derivation of pedo-/paedo- words
While trying to clean up Paedobaptism which has a rather messy explanation of its derivation, I looked up Paediatrics and Paedophilia to see their take on the greek stem, and both of them use different Greek words again as the source! I suspect this may be not only a consistency problem but also accuracy on at least two articles' part. I've been told you're the best person to ask about these things, so I was wondering if you were able to shed some light on the issue. Cheers --BigBlueFish 09:58, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Pedo- comes from the root "πεδ-" that in greek gives words like "πέδιση"="standing" (not exactly-sorry my english is not so good and I don;t now the exact word), "πεδίο"="field", "γήπεδο" (γη=earth) ="sports' ground" and others. Paedo- comes from "Παις" (genitive:Παιδός (paidos)) meaning "child". As an example, have a look at orthopedics. It comes from "ortho-" = "correct" and "ped-". Therefore, the form "orthopaedics" used in the past is wrong. Because orthopedics has something to do with the "correct way of standing" and not with the "correct child" :).--Mik2 21:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Yeah... I was referring to words containing pedo as an Americanisation; Project2501a sort of cleared it up in my talk. --BigBlueFish 19:53, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedians in Greece
Hi, I understand that you are either Greek Wikipedian or a Wikipedian living in/with an interest in Greece.

The category page Wikipedians/Greece has been replaced with Category:Wikipedians in Greece but your name still appears on the old list. You might considering moving it. You might also consider adding adding Template:Greekwiki to your user page.

A Greek Wikipedians' notice board has been in existence for some time but is terribly underutilised. It would certainly benefit from your involvement.--Damac 12:26, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Conscription in Greece
I'd like to add some elements about Greek Army, peculiar to Greece, that seem alien to other countries, as well as the 'importance' of conscription and the army in general. For example a foreign person was amazed when I mentioned that army partcakes in parades of national celebrations. Also we need some references of the army in pop culture, like that a man proves his manhood only if he conscribes, while if he denies he is deemed useless by society and the law even prohibits him to work. It is also said that 'Woman has to give birth, man has to go to the army' that shows adequately the whole picture in the Greek's mind. I think you are more qualified to add these things in the appropriate article, or I would put it myself. Do you think they are important to add? Pictureuploader 08:28, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Did you think about that again? Pictureuploader 22:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Classic Rock
Hello. I was wondering if you would like to participate in my classic rock survey. I'm trying to find the most like classic rock song. There is more information on my user page. Hope you participate! 00:37, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Nash.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nash.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 03:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:DJ Premier5.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DJ Premier5.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FuriousFreddy 01:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

WP CS
Are you still interested in participating in WikiProject Computer science? Things are active there again, if you'd like to drop in and see what's going on. --Allan McInnes 04:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Arthur Koestler.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Arthur Koestler.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Soothing R  16:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi


Barnstar for your work here. ε γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  01:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Just stopped by and liked what I saw. Επιθυμώ ότι μίλησα τα ελληνικά, (I tried to say "I wish I spoke Greek"). See you.  ε  γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  21:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Papoulias_karolos.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Papoulias_karolos.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 10:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Pages up for deletion
There are two pages up for deletion Cretan/Spartan connection and Revolution within the form. I ask for a vote for Transwiki. Thanks. WHEELER 23:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Reverted your edit in White dwarf
I reverted this edit: White dwarf 13:15, 4 February 2006 Project2501a (^_^)
 * Eventually, over hundreds of billions and billions of years, white dwarfs cool…

The repetition is a bit awkward and appears unnecesary. &mdash;Ryanrs 07:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Georges Perec.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Georges Perec.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

This image does not fall in any category acceptable as Fair Use according to the United States law, and not even under the Wikipedia policy.

This image may be deleted at anytime because its licencing terms is invalid, and it may even break international copyright and author's right rules (for publications) and the French law applicable to:
 * the publisher's right of LeMonde.fr (a wellknown french commercial dialy newspaper) that hosts this site
 * the policy of LeMonde.fr applicable to personal blogs hosted by LeMonde.fr
 * the author's right for the blog from where this photo was taken.
 * the very restrictive law protecting french people's image, even after their death (french person rights belong to their successor family for a long period).
 * I think that this photo comes from a book cover, and if so, the book publisher owns the copyright and publication rights (so even the blog on LeMonde.fr cannot reproduce it without authorization).
 * Note that the blog you are citing DOES NOT reference directly this photo, so LeMonde may have not reviewed the policy applicable to it.
 * The photo seems to have been edited to remove the copyright labels or the author's signature or the name of the photographer (who also owns rights, unless he was payed by the book publisher to take this photo.)

See Talk:Georges Perec for further justifications and talks (or the talk page of the image itself regarding the copyright infringement)... Thanks. verdy_p 01:17, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Edward Norton Lorenz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Edward Norton Lorenz.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 03:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar, OTR & PUA Review
FYI. You may want to look and comment here: Barnstar and award proposals/Proposed Changes. For your reference, the guidelines are referenced here: Barnstar Proposal Guidelines. Thanks -- evrik 18:34, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Slick_Rick.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Slick_Rick.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Gil.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Gil.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 07:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Slick Rick.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Slick Rick.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 07:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

RE: Good edit
Calm down you crazy dumb-dumb! :P
 * --Michalis Famelis 21:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

HERE! I'M WRITING THIS IN ALL-CAPS, SO THAT EVEN A BIGOT LIKE YOU LEARNS WHAT WIKIPEDIA POLICY IS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words

Taken from Wikipedia's guidelines. ''Weasel words are words or phrases that smuggle bias into seemingly supported statements by attributing opinions to anonymous sources. Weasel words give the force of authority to a statement without letting the reader decide if the source of the opinion is reliable. If a statement can't stand on its own without weasel words, it lacks neutral point of view; either a source for the statement should be found, or the statement should be removed.

For example, "Montréal is the nicest city in the world," is a biased or normative statement. Application of a weasel word can give the illusion of neutral point of view: "Some people say Montreal is the nicest city in the world."

Although this is an improvement, since it no longer states the opinion as fact, it remains uninformative. Who says that? You? Me? When did they say it? How many people think that? What kind of people think that? Where are they? What kind of bias do they have? Why is this of any significance?

Weasel words don't really give a neutral point of view; they just spread hearsay, or couch personal opinion in vague, indirect syntax. It is better to put a name and a face on an opinion than to assign an opinion to an anonymous source.

Here are some weasel words that are often found in Wikipedia articles (but shouldn't be):

* "Some people say..." * "Some argue..."''

So then, that includes insertion of your pro-terrorist bias into the article on Greece's domestic terrorism. You keep editing your bias into the article, asshole, and I'll keep striking out until you find a proper reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.251.123.49 (talk • contribs)

Message from User:Porfyrios
Well, well. The message below is actually quite sensible, provided you ignore the tone.. Here's the thing. He's right. You can't insert your particular opinions under a vague "many people think" banner ; it's just not allowed in here. And that's exactly what you insist on doing in the "domestic terrorism" section of the article Greece. So, my friend, either you search for citations that back your entry, or I'm reporting you to the administrator board for abusing the rules (apparently, the vandalism board is not responsible for this sort of thing). I'm sure there are plenty of places you can troll for relevant citations. Your warning has been served. Bye, bye, now, have fun. Porfyrios 08:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Hilarious titles. Really, that was comedy gold. I was split in half laughing. Gag me with a spoon.
 * Other than that, all I'm saying is, be reasonable in your edits.
 * Don't troll, don't use weasel-wording to infuse articles with your agenda, and don't ignore valid criticisms. Porfyrios 09:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

οι ελ στην τροια
... ουτε και το αμερικανοισραηλινο λομπυ δεν αφισβητει την υπερτεχνολογια των Ελ στον τρωικο πολεμο. Απεναντιας την περιλαμβανουν στις ταινιες τους! ( Η εικονα ειναι γνησια ) Επειδη σε κοβω λιακοενημερωμενο θελω τη βοηθεια σου. 1. Μπορεις να βρεις μια εικονα του Λεωνιδα Γεωργιαδη για τη σελιδα Georgiades Bros ; 2. Στην εκπομπη <<Η ωρα του Λαου>> Nikos Konstantinidis μηπως ξερεις το μικρο ονομα του   κυριου Μανιαρα και του παπα που ευλογαει τα ονοματα ; 3. Καμια ιδεα για ενα αρθρο για το ΛΑ.Ο.Σ. ; panosfidis

Zamanfou
Πως φτασαμε στο '63:

Ελλας 1957: Η ΕΔΑ ανεβαινει διαρκως. Η Α.Μ. Φρειδερικη κρινει πως ηκινδυνευει η διεθνης εικονα της χωρας. ( Μη νομιζουν οι ξενοι η βασιλισσα δεν ειναι αγαπητη στο λαο...). Ο εξοχωτατος κ.κ.κ.κ. Κ.Καραμανλης εχει τη Σουπερ Λυση στην κωλοτσεπη: Εκλογικος νόμος που <<θαβει>> το τριτο κομμα (ποιο αραγε;)

Ελλας 1958: Το αναπαντεχο γινεται: ΕΔΑ 25% Ε.Κ. 24% !!! Οι κεντρωοι καταρρακωνονται και τα <<αναρχοκομμουνια>> στη βουλη με 70 βουλευτες!!! Ρεζιλι του ΝΑΤΟ η Ελλας. Η Α.Μ. ορυεται. Ο εξοχωτατος αφηνει τις εξυπνες λυσεις και επιστρεφει στις παραδοσεις. ( Αν δεν εχεις κανει κρατηση στις φυλακες Αβερωφ δεν βρισκεις θεση...)

Ελλας 1963: Η ταξη αποκατασταθηκε: ΕΡΕ πρωτη και με διαφορα ! Εδα 14% διαφορα -11%! ( Μα καλα τοσο χαλια αντιπολιτευση εκανε ολα αυτα τα χρονια ;) Τοσο γαματη κυβερνηση ειχε ο εξοχωτατος ) Ο εθναρχης πανηγυριζει. Η Α.Μ. καμαρωνει: Τελικα ειμαι δημοφιλης! Η Ελλας αποκατασταθηκε !

Σχετικα με το αρθρο οσοι το βριζουν ντρεπονται μηπως <<φανουν τα χαλια μας>> ! Το αρθρο ειναι καλο απο την αποψη οτι 1. οι εκφρασεις υπαρχουν 2. Η κατασταση υπαρχει. οσον αφορα τα αιτια οντως καποιος θα μπορουσε να διαφωνησει ( ακουγεται λιγο POV ). Ο γραψαρχιδισμος ειναι παγκοσμιο φαινομενο και οχι μονο ελληνικο. Το αρθρο παρουσιαζει τους Ελληνες σαν πρωταθλητες. Πανε δες τι γινεται σε αλλες χωρες ( Αγγλια Ισπανια ...) θα καταλαβεις τι εστι <<στ'αρχιδια μου!>>. Επιπλεον ο γραψαρχιδισμος εμφανιζεται κατα καιρους σε καθε ανθρωπο (π.χ. γυρισα απο τη δουλεια αρπαζω μια μπυρα στρωνομαι μπροστα στο χαζοκουτι και το τελευταιο που θελω εκεινη την ωρα ειναι ΕΝΑΣ ΜΑΛΑΚΑΣ ΝΑ ΜΟΥ ΤΑ ΠΡΗΖΕΙ ! ) αυτο ομως δεν σημαινει πως ο καθε ανθρωπος ειναι ΚΑΘΕ ΜΕΡΑ ΟΛΗ ΜΕΡΑ ΖΜΦ. Περι χυδαιοτητας: Χυδαιοτητα *ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ* στον κοσμο αρα μια πληρης εγκυκλοπαιδεια πρεπει να επισημαινει την υπαρξη της. Θα ψηφιζα υπερ του αρθρου αλλα δεν ξερω πως ψηφιζουν εχε με ενημερο.

αργα και θα ειναι πολυυυυυυυυυυυυυυ μεγαλη. panosfidis
 * Σχετικα με τον λιακο Αν τα δυο αρθρα συσσωματωθουν η σελιδα θα κατεβαινει πολυυυυυυυυυυυυ

rfa
I wanted to stop by and thank you for your constructive criticism of my RFA. It's helped, and is helping, to improve me as a wikipedian and an editor. I look forward to gaining your support in the future. Until then, keep on keepin on. &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  19:27, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Human rights in Greece
Nice edits on that article - eliminating the normative language and assigning agency, as it were. Subtle, but very constructive. Don't you think this article could be expanded? Just what you have on your user page alone would flesh out the conscription issue, and I could summarize the mistreatment of refugees and asylum-seekers (when I have time). Bruxism 02:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Zamanfou (συνεχεια)
Εχοντας διαβασει τα σχολια των αναγνωστων και τα δικα σου, θεωρω πως το αρθρο ειναι καλο αλλα θα επρεπε να περιλαμβανει ενα γενικοτερο φοντο των δεκαετιων 70 80 90. Αδυνατει να απαντησει σε ερωτηματα οπως :

Ποιος ξεκινησε το ρευμα; Υπηρχαν δηλωμενοι θιασωτες; Υπαρχουν ουσιωδη παραδειγματα της επιδρασης του; Καποια ελλιπης απαντηση εχει δοθει. Π.χ. πεθαινει ενας φανταρος απο μαλακιες των διοικητων του αλλα στα @@ μας καπου θα εφταιγε και αυτος για να την επαθε. Πρεπει να ξεκαθαρισω πως το 80 ημουν απο -3 εως 7 χρονων οποτε δεν εχω ουσιωδεις αναμνησεις. ωστοσο πιστευω πως σε μια περιοδο πολιτικης ασταθειας 89-91 που γινονταν εκλογες ανα 3 μηνες με συστημα κοντα στην απλη αναλογικη οπου καθε κομα μπορει να παρει λογο λογικα θα υπηρχε υπηρχε ισα ισα μεγαλη κινητικοτητα. Η ανοδος του Μητσοτακη με 50% και η πτωση του με 39% (διαφορα δεκα μοναδων σε 3 χρονια) δειχνει κατι αναλογο. Οσον αφορα την ποδοσφαιροποιηση αυτο θεωρειται γενικα φαινομενο της χουντας για αποπροσανατολισμο του κοσμου. Η δεκαετια 60 ( εποχη του 1 1 4 ) ειναι μαλλον περιοδος κινητικοποιησης που τελειωνει με την ανατροπη του παπανδρεου. Τοτε καθε μερα γινονταν πορεις. (η τουλαχιστον ετσι γραφουν τα χρονικα της εποχης)

Θελω να καταληξω οτι το ζαμανφου ειναι μαλλον η ασχολια του απελπισμενου μη πολιτικοποιημενου πολιτη που απλως αδιαφορει για τις πολιτικες εξελιξεισ γιατι

θεωρει πως δεν τον επηρρεαζουν θεωρει πως δεν μπορει να επεμβει π.χ. στις ευρωεκλογες ομως ειχαμε 35% αποχη (αν θυμαμαι καλα). Αρα μπορουμε να πουμε πως το ζμφ εκφραζει ενα ρευμα 35% του ελληνικου πληθυσμου (που ειναι μικρο) και απεχει συνειδητα απο την πολιτικοποιηση του επειδη

ολοι ειναι μαλακες ολοι ειναι ιδιοι ολοι τα αρπαζουν αλλα η πιο ομορφη χωρα ειναι η Ελλαδαρα ( η ετσι τουλαχιστον μας εμαθαν στο δημοτικο)

Πιστευω οτι αυτη ειναι η ουσι του ΖΜΦ.

Εδω ειναι Ελλαδα. Οποιον δεν τον αρεσει να γκρεμοτσακιστει και να φυγει! Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zamanfou"

User:Panosfidis

most trustworthy institutions ?!@#%%&*??
Χαζευα το conscription in Greece και αναγνωρισα το στυλ σου. Εχω ενα σχολιο οσον αφορα το most trustworthy. Η δημοσκοπηση ειναι στημενη. Ειναι ιδια με αυτες του Κωνσταντινιδη.
 * Εμπιστευεστε τους πολιτικους ;
 * Οχιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιι
 * Τις πολυεθνικες;
 * Οχιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιι
 * Την εκκλησια που προσευχεται για τη σωτηρια μας ;
 * ΝΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΙ
 * Το στρατο που μας φυλαει απο τους Τουρκους;
 * ΝΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΙ
 * Την αστυνομια που πιανει τους κλεφτες;
 * ΝΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΙ

Το ερωτημα ειναι ως προς τι τους εμπιστευεσαι ??? Ας δουμε τι θα ελεγε ο μεσος Ελλην: ΝΑΙ ο στρατος θα φυλαξει τα συνορα. Δεν θα φορτωσω τους παπαδες με οπλα για να τους στειλω στον Εβρο. Ουτε προκειται αν θελω να γινω εναρετος να συμβουλευτω ενα στελεχος πολυεθνικης. Δεν θα απευθυνθω σε βουλευτη για να φυλαει την περιουσια μου και ουτε θα παω στον λοχαγο να εξομολογηθω τα σφαλματα μου ( και να φαω 20 μερες φυλακη). Δεν περιμενω απο εναν φασιστα κωλομπατσο να φτιαξει το συνταγμα ουτε τον τραγοπαπα να κανει εξωτερικη πολιτικη. Το μονο ευκολο ειναι να σου βγαλω την αντιθετη δημοσκοπηση:


 * Σε ποιον θα εμπιστευοσασταν τη διακυβερνηση του τοπου;
 * Σε μια στρατιωτικη χουντα;
 * Σε μια αστυνομικη χουντα;
 * Στους παπαδες;
 * Στις πολυεθνικες;
 * Σε ενα δημοκρατικα εκλεγμενο πολιτικο κομα;

Συμπερασματα ερευνας : Το 90% των Ελληνων εμπιστευεται τους πολιτικους !
 * Το θεμα λοιπον ειναι <<Ποιον εμπιστευεσαι ως προς ΤΙ;>>

User:Panosfidis

ΑΘΛΙΕ !!!
Τολμησες να προσβαλλεις τη χωρα του Θεου ??? Ξερεις τι σε περιμενει ??? (παρε μια γευση) user:Panosfidis

Image Tagging for Image:Alvin_toffler.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alvin_toffler.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Wireless Central Coordinated Protocol (WiCCP)
I made some changes on the Hidden node problem page and just noticed that it seems that you intended to create a WiCCP page (in 2005 ;-). I removed the dangling link for now, re-add it if appropriate. BTW any idea what the status of the WiCCP software is? It seems to be dormant. Is it in use at Patras anymore? As there is a Windows version of it (that for example Frottle lacks) I think it would be a good idea to set up a sourceforge project or at least provide the sources for the Windows software, too :-). NotInventedHere 09:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

conscription in greece
the section contains many uncited statements (π.χ. I don't think there is ageism in greece) which I dispute. Btw vgale ton koloratsistaro ton Malcom X apo tin selida sou. Thank u for contacting me. Mitsos 09:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

I think it is considered as a warning sign. Mitsos 09:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

I am telling you I dispute that there is ageism in Greece. What about Malcom X? Mitsos 11:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Kalomira
Oi akolouthes paragrafoi vghkan apo to arthro Kalomoira Saranti ws 'anakriveis' kai 'proswpikes apopseis'. Egw ta egrapsa kai h eirwnia einai oti eimai fan ths Kalomoiras kai den apoteloun proswpikes apopseis. Thewrw oti to na grafoun afta ta opoia apoteloun pagmatika gegonota den einai dysfhmish:

However Kalomoira is mostly attacked by intellectuals and leftists and generally enemies of pop music. Although she is famed for her high charisma, natural charm and overall innocent image, her 'enemies' mostly accuse her for low mentality and citing that the last thing 'degraded' Greek society needs, is idolising an imported bimbo archetype.

Due to aiming and younger audiences, the fact that her promotion by the image makers' is trying to establish an 'innocent' and some kind of baby look of Britney Spears standards, is often satirized, since it's a concept never factualised for any Greek singer before. Sakis Rouvas also suffered from similar attacks.

Tha thela thn apopsh sou Pictureuploader 14:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

ZMF
Απο οτι καταλαβα ( τα εγγλεζικα μου δεν ειναι και ο,τι καλυτερο ) ενα ματσο ευπατριδιδες που δεν αφηνουν καν στοιχεια εχουν τις γνωστες αντιδρασιες. Εχω ψιλοχασει τις τελευταιες εξελιξεις αλλα υποθετω θα ξαναπαμε σε ψηφοφορια και θα μεινει οπως ειναι. Ωστοσο προς υποστηριξει μπορουν να βρεθουν παραδφειγματα απο το προσφατο παρελθον. π.χ.
 * Απαγωγες πακιστανων ¨Τι πειραζει αν το ιδιο μου το κρατος απαγαγει φυλακιζει βασανιζει ; εμενα δεν με επιασε οποτε ολα καλα. Το γεγονος οτι κανενας ελληνας δεν αντεδρασε ( περα απο τους γνωστους κουλτουριαρεους ) για κατι που ΚΑΙΕΙ ειναι ανησυχητικο. θα μπορουσε να προστεθει και στο ιδιο το αρθρο σαν παραδειγμα.
 * Νομος πλαισιο. Αμα δεν φτασει το μαχαιρι στο κοκαλο δεν κουνιεται φυλλο. Ψηφιζονται και λαμνβανουν χωρα τα πιο μαζικα κινηματα. Και ομως: Οι τελειοφοιτοι γκρινιαζουν : Χαρη στους μαλακες τους κουλτουριαραιους δεν μπορω να δωσω τα 5 μαθηματα που μου μενουν να παρω πτυχιο να φυγω και να φανε ολοι τη σκονη μου. Σαν φοιτητης το ζω απο κοντα και ξερω τι σου λεω.
 * Αιωνιοι φοιτητες : Ξαφνικα τα ατομα που επιβαρυνουν *ΜΟΝΟ* τους γερους τους εγιναν προβλημα για το ελληνικο κρατος ( προβλημα που πρεπει να εξαληφθει ) ομως ¨ΔΕΝ Ειμαι αιωνιος -> Στ'αρχιδια μου !!!
 * αυτα σαν παραδειγματα. Οταν σκασεις σαλονικα στειλε κανενα μηνυμα 6995089313. θα σου δειξω το καφενειο του Μακη ( δεν σε κοβω για τυπο που παει παραλια και πληρωνει 5 ευρωπουλα τον καφε ετσι για να νιωθει τρεντι )
 * user:Panosfidis

liako
Γεια! Καποιος που δεν αφησε ονομα μου εκανε παραπονα οτι το σχεδιο με τον Ηρακλη και την Αθηνα δνε μπορει να μεινει στη σελιδα του λιακο αν δεν υπαρχουν χειροπιαστες αποδειξεις κλπ κλπ και καποιος αλλος εσβησε ολη τη σελιδα του λιακο κλπ κλπ. Αν εχεις χρονο κανε μια παρεμβαση στο θεμα. user:Panosfidis

Image Tagging Image:Barrington Levy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Barrington Levy.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - SCEhard T 12:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Pali
Sygnwmh pou se xanahreiazomai. Tha thela na mou peis an symfwneis me afta pou lew edw Talk:Economy of Greece. Thanks Pictureuploader 15:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Hellenic Republic
I guess you're right. That's why I've never used it since creation (June 6,2006 -ie. 6/6/6 now that I notice!) So, what do you propose? :N i k o S il v e r: 23:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

ξανα-Γειά

 * 1) Η σελίδα σου επαναλαμβάνεται 2 φορές
 * 2) Καλός ο Σταρχιδισμός. Θυμάμαι μια γκόμενα που της είχα πεί ότι είμαι αναίσθητος, πολυγαμικός και σταρχιδιστής, μου είχε απαντήσει: "Και γώ είμαι στομουνίστρια!" :-)
 * 3) Δες με τη σειρά σου: Featured article candidates/Macedonia (terminology), και WikiProject Ethnic groups/Rules for lists of X-Americans