User talk:Project cleanup

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chaldean Christians, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chaldean Christians was changed by Project cleanup (u) (t) deleting 26112 characters on 2010-03-23T22:24:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Chaldean Christians. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 22:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


 * If you have concerns with the content of the article, I suggest you build consensus for the change on the talk page, Talk:Chaldean Christians, and work toward a neutrally-written treatment of the material. Additionally, there is no restriction on who may or may not edit an article, so long as they are abiding by the guidelines of Wikipedia. Accordingly, you may not suggest that the Chaldean Christians article is only to be edited by Chaldeans, certain Chaldeans, or any other subset of users. —C.Fred (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —C.Fred (talk) 22:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
I see several issues with your conduct:
 * 1) You have chosen a username which is misleading, and thus a violation of the username policy.
 * 2) You have repeatedly edit an article to present a non-neutral point of view.
 * 3) Your edit summaries have been been disruptive.
 * 4) Your user page declares further your point of view and intent to press this view onto Wikipedia.

You have been invited to take the matter to the talk page of the article and question and refused to. Accordingly, in the interest of preventing further disruption on Wikipedia:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

—C.Fred (talk) 22:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)