User talk:Projmkultra

Your edit to Wikipedia:Citing sources
Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Citing sources (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Pulp Science Fiction
A tag has been placed on Pulp Science Fiction, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FisherQueen (Talk) 13:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:COI about creating or editing articles in which you have a personal interest. Wikipedia has strict rules about this; please follow them.   John Broughton  |  Talk 20:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Alex Potok
A tag has been placed on Alex Potok, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Generally, authors become Notable only after their books are published. Fan-1967 19:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia to advertise you will be blocked from editing. -- Chris 73 | Talk 12:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|30px|left]] This is your last warning. The next time you insert blatant advertising into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent advertisers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. -- Chris 73 | Talk 13:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * (from Talk:Cogito Animalia This is my work and I want it to be displayed in the public domain, in a few months, I will have a legal option to provide the ISBN and the copyright certificates, but I want this name to be registered to me by the GNU Free Documentation License Agreement, as I'm not advertising, this title and mentioned work have a tracking to the Library of Congress, Copyright Office.
 * Regardless if you own the content or not, Wikipedia is not for advertising. Just because it is in the library of congress, it does not mean that there should be an encyclopedia article about it. Please do not add the topic to wikipedia again, unless you are or the book are very notable (i.e. if you win the literature Nobel price, you are welcome to have your own article). See [Wikipedia:notability]] for details. -- Chris 73 | Talk 13:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Cogito Animalia -- last warning
Have you read the above warnings? Just because you wrote a book doesn't mean you're entitled to a Wikipedia article about it. See Notability. Don't post Cogito Animalia again or you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki 13:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Octagon-warning.svg|left|30px]]You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. -- Chris 73 | Talk 13:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cogito animalia
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cogito animalia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Seascic T/C 04:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)