User talk:Prokupek

Retain I cannot understand the fact that anonymous Wikipedia-admins let the users vote (!!!) for or against the contents and the purpose of an expert article and thus decide about the short name of a sovereign founding member of the UNO (then under the name Czechoslovakia). They quite forget that only the particular state gives itself its own short name (if necessary, e.g., after splitting up of a former joint state into two), which was fluctuating in the course of history. This follows from the article under discussion. The complainers (apparently aiming at the name Czechia cancellation or even at a ban on the name Česko/Czechia) can only complain at the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (UNGEGN), which organizes regular UN Conferences on the Standardization of Geographical Names or, as a lower authority, Regional conferences. So the approach and activities of the "enlightened" wiki-admins are, in my opinion, totalitarian and have a tinge of medieval obscurantism Retain I cannot understand the fact that anonymous Wikipedia-admins let the users vote (!!!) for or against the contents and the purpose of an expert article and thus decide about the short name of a sovereign founding member of the UNO (then under the name Czechoslovakia). They quite forget that only the particular state gives itself its own short name (if necessary, e.g., after splitting up of a former joint state into two), which was fluctuating in the course of history. This follows from the article under discussion. The complainers (apparently aiming at the name Czechia cancellation or even at a ban on the name Česko/Czechia) can only complain at the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (UNGEGN), which organizes regular UN Conferences on the Standardization of Geographical Names or, as a lower authority, Regional conferences. So the approach and activities of the "enlightened" wiki-admins are, in my opinion, totalitarian and have a tinge of medieval obscurantism Ilaned