User talk:Promis2012

References to PROMIS

 * That is not Wikipedia's purpose. We only want articles about things that reliable sources unconnected to the subject have discussed, not whitepapers on a new paradigm.
 * BuzzCut Translation: We can't accept articles about something that doesn't exist yet or that hasn't been discussed by reputable newspapers or periodicals. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 04:10, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Answer
PROMIS is an existing service and there are many published and official documentation that describe the service and the project. The purpose here is to write a neutral description of PROMIS taking in account all the existing documentation. I would greatly appreciate a reactivation of the account with the new username in order to solve the conflict and to propose a new text completely neutral. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen (Promis2012) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. The article in question is PROMIS®. Thank you. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 07:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PROMIS®


A tag has been placed on PROMIS®, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Pink Bull  13:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing
Hi there, Promis2012. I'm afraid I have had to delete the page you created, PROMIS®, because it was unambiguously promotional. I see that you have been having problems with this recently, but I am impressed that you said on a talk page you are willing to listen to advice and improve. Firstly, as Cindy said above, it would be a good idea to change your username - editing under the name of a company is not really allowed, and will make it much harder to stick to our standard of neutrality. To do that, click here and follow the guidelines. I then suggest you read two short guidelines this one on promotion, and this on conflicts of interest. They will give you advice on how to edit productively. Additionally, it might be a good idea to visit the Teahouse - that is a place for new users which has been offering great support to those who need it in a friendly environment. If you get stuck at any point, feel free to ask me - you can contact me at my talk page. I hope that helps. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company, organization, or clients. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  19:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Motivations for re-activation
Dear JamesBWatson, I agree that I did not get the correct update online after the suggestions received but I did not want to submit the same article twice. I did not have the time to rewrite the entire article following the proposed suggestions and it was my error not to delete it on the fly. My request is to create new documentation on the arguments of integrated management, my expertise. I would not get into "project" oriented way of publication. I could get it wrong as I did but not for bad intentions and I am trying to get in the community recovering the bad start. I hope that you can accept this.