User talk:Promoking

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Wmahan. 17:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding commercial or personal-website links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. Wmahan. 17:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. Wmahan. 17:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. Wmahan. 18:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello Whmahan,

I was not spaming Wikipedia. I found the website a while back and really am a fan of it. I just wanted to add it to Wikipedia so people would know what it is and that it is more then just a website its a community. Also I was not spaming artist pages I was adding links to the interviews with the artist on there page so people would be able to read them. I hope you understand that I am a fan and not a spammer.

Thanks


 * Promoking, while your desire to contribute to Wikipedia is appreciated, you are not allowed to use Wikipedia to promote a site--even if you are only a fan. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising and users who add many links to one site may be viewed with suspicion. Wmahan. 18:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello Whmahan,

Thanks for the fast response. I will not ad anymore links to artist pages. I do think Wikipedia is cool and hope you guys keep the page I created up and others find it they will be able to add content to it.

Thanks


 * Thank you. I will wait and see what other editors think about the article; if it can be edited to conform to the neutral point of view policy, it may be able to stay. Wmahan. 19:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Wmahan,

I tried using the help page to make sure the page fit the neutral point of view but it was a bit confusing. Can you edit the page so that it fits the neutral point of view as I am new to this?

Thanks


 * It looks like the article was deleted. It wasn't my decision, and I hope you don't take it personally. The standards for articles about websites can be a bit strict, since so many people create articles about non-notable and borderline-notable websites. Wmahan. 04:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)