User talk:Prontosunray

Sigs trades
Can I suggest that rather than a handful of short articles with a lot of duplicated content, that a better approach to the sigs trades might be a single article, which talks about initial training at Pirbright and Blandford,then goes into each trade as an individual section. It should reduce some of the duplications and has more potential to get to a credible size, as it is I think each of the individual trades lacks any real notability so is vulnerable to deletion.

ALR (talk) 09:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

I've fleshed out a little about the supervisory trades and commissionining, could probably do with more on both of those. There is no need to overdo the links, it starts to get quite busy and more challenging to read.

ALR (talk) 11:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Sigs equipment sources
Just reviewing your input, a lot of it reads as if it's lifted from course notes from Blandford. If you're using YofS or FofS notes then it's fair enough to cite them as a source, they're published by the university as part of the accreditation regime.

ALR (talk) 19:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Edward M. Flint for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward M. Flint is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edward M. Flint until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Aaron Liu (talk) 12:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)