User talk:Propertysouth

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Hajnal Ban has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bexample\.com (links: http://www.example.com ). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:32, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hajnal Ban
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hajnal Ban. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Hajnal Ban. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Signing edit summaries
Hi, you don't need to include the four tildas ~ in the edit summary box. You only need to add them when you comment on a talk page (like I am about to do now). Regards, WWGB (talk) 03:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion discussion
Hi again. Could I suggest that you not use the word "keep" before every post at Articles for deletion/Hajnal Ban. Some editors get annoyed at what they perceive to be "multiple votes". Regards, WWGB (talk) 11:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Getting in contact
Hi, I'm a journo working for a local newspaper and would like to write an article on Hajnal's new page and the discussion around whether it should be deleted or not. Could you please contact me on patishka67@gmail.com as soon as possible? I'm interested in why you created this page and who you are. Cheers. Patishka (talk) 00:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Hajnal3.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Hajnal3.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Hajnal3.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Hajnal3.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 05:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Stop call me a vandal when I'm not a vandal! It's disruptive and uncivil.'' Bidgee (talk) 06:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tiptoety talk 06:35, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

--Propertysouth (talk) 06:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)May I ask they we refrain from removing Hajnal Ban's picture until it is checked for copyright. This can only be the logical way forward, as she has stated it is her picture, she has emailed wikki and all other requirements have been met under wiki policy. To remove it before this process is checked is not the right way to proceed.


 * I serve as a member of the foundations OTRS team, and am in the process of reviewing the permissions email. Please hold off on the reverting until I am finished. Thanks, Tiptoety  talk 06:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in Hajnal Ban. It appears you may be engaged in an edit war. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 21:48, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Hajnal Ban. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bidgee (talk) 10:34, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey Sean, how come you stopped using this wiki account? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.55.17 (talk) 01:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)