User talk:Proph.Elija

May 2024
Hello, I'm RomeshKubajali. I noticed that you recently removed content from Enki without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RomeshKubajali (talk) 21:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi!
 * I'm sorry for not providing any feedback when I removed content. Thank you for pointing out on this as I'm new.
 * Thing is the part I removed I believe is untrue as it suggests non accurate information.
 * The part in question - "The consort of Ea, known as Ninhursag, Ki, Uriash Damkina, "lady of that which is below", or Damgalnunna, "big lady of the waters", originally was fully equal with Ea, but in more patriarchal Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian times plays a part merely in association with her lord. Generally, however, Enki seems to be a reflection of pre-patriarchal times, in which relations between the sexes were characterised by a situation of greater gender equality. In his character, he prefers persuasion to conflict, which he seeks to avoid if possible." - is simply based on false ideas on gender roles and the populace beliefs of that time.
 * I am aware that gender politics have become a sensitive subject in our times but I believe history related sites such as wikipedia should try and check more of the validity of the information added in a subjective manner that aims to share the truth rather what people romanticise the past for. Proph.Elija (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)