User talk:Prophet of Truth and Knowledge

May 2020
Your recent editing history at Bob Dylan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Limburg-Luxemburg dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Croatia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

September 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sanskrit. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please familiarize yourself with the relevant wikipedia guideline (MOS:ERA in this case) before making similar mass-changes. Abecedare (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

New message from Abecedare
Abecedare (talk) 00:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Abecedare (talk) 00:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Please observe style and era conventions for BC/BCE dates
I first noticed this edit of yours at Sanskrit where you changed the era term "BCE" to "BC" all over the article. This was undone by User:Abecedare and addressed at the Talk page, and in two discussion sections above. You then reverted, again inserting your preferred version. I undid that. Then I noticed that the same thing happened in at History of Anatolia, and so I undid those. I thought I was seeing a pattern, and so I checked your edit at Culture of Israel, and I wasn't surprised to see that you had changed BCE to BC there as well. So it appears that you've changed the era abbreviations at: I had to wonder if it was coincidence that in all three cases, the countries involved are primarily ones with a population that is overwhelmingly non-Christian. Please observe the conventions at the Manual of Style, in particular, MOS:ERA and MOS:STYLEVAR. Beyond that, MOS:TIES may apply to the three articles you tried to change. If you have a particular preference for using "B.C." because of its associations with the Christian religion, please restrict your changes to those cases where it aligns with the recommendations of the style guide. And don't forget to add something to the edit summary field about each edit you make. Your edit summary here was unhelpful, and seemed more like an attempt at a derail for an edit that lacked any guideline-backed justification, and I think you knew that when you made it. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * one article on a topic closely related to Hinduism,
 * one article on a topic closely related to Islam, and
 * one article on a topic closely related to Judaism.

Only warning
Hi, Prophet. I will just add to User:Mathglot's polite and explanatory post above that edit warring to push for your own style preference with a parroted edit summary as you did here — without even going to the talkpage — is pretty disruptive. Are you saying you actually read MOS:ERA, that you refer to in your edit summary? I will block you if you make another non-MOS-compliant change of era style in any article. Bishonen &#124; tålk 04:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC).

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)