User talk:Prosportslogs

Doug Chapman
I removed your comment at Wikipedia talk:Libel because that page is for a different purpose. In the future, problems of that nature should be reported at WP:BLPN. Or, ask a question at WP:HELPDESK and someone will work out what to do. I see that some bad content was added to the article at Doug Chapman (American football) so I semi-protected the article for a month. That will prevent unregistered users (IP addresses) and new users from editing the article for a month.

Please be aware that Wikipedia has a strict policy that prohibits using this website to discuss possible legal action or similar off-wiki retribution—see no legal threats. Any account that suggests legal action may occur will be indefinitely blocked so legal action takes place entirely away from this website. It's unclear what reporting someone's IP address might involve, but that sounds like off-wiki action and should not be discussed here. Report any problems at the link above and leave action for experienced editors. Johnuniq (talk) 05:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Your recent editing history at Doug Chapman (American football) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)