User talk:Prosvelent

February 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Me Too movement does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Me Too movement, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. As per WP:DAILYMAIL, Consensus has determined that the Daily Mail (including its online version, dailymail.co.uk) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited. Peaceray (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)