User talk:ProtectYourFamily

ProtectYourFamily, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 * Thank you! ProtectYourFamily (talk) 21:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Craniosacral therapy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 13:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Then don’t attack me and tell me to “go away and I’m incompetent” when I cite reliable. Don’t dish it if you can’t take it, and then don’t try to gaslight the situation. ProtectYourFamily (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * There are proper channels for addressing personal attacks against you; fighting fire with fire will only get you blocked. Only you can control what you do. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Then why haven’t any of you warned the other “editor” who started this. That editor is so incompetent and corrupt.  The Wikipedia cabal wants to insult and denigrate people, and then they become a bunch of crybabies when people fight back? ProtectYourFamily (talk)
 * I issued no warnings; I simply observed this comment. You aren't helping yourself here, and if you do not adopt a more collaborative attitude quickly with no personal attacks, you may find yourself blocked. 331dot (talk) 13:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Threatening to block me is a warning, and I’m responding on my own talk page. Threatening me again for defending myself on my own talk page is akin to a dirty police union leader attacking a citizen for standing up against longtime rogue dirty cops.  We also have longtime rogue dirty editors, and you answered the question that you did NOT warn him, which is why you’re now getting so defensive and nasty, because I’m exposing the rampant misconduct here on Wikipedia. ProtectYourFamily (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I had warned no one in this matter until my first comment here, which was in response to your comment. Since you seem to be here to argue and insult, and not collaborate, I have blocked you. See the notice below for how to appeal. 331dot (talk) 13:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 13:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 13:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC) Blocking me for defending myself against you. You are exactly just like a power tripping dirty cop beating an African-American for daring to speak up. Wikipedia is illiterate and corrupt and a clear result that this website is only here because incompetent and illiterate editors hide behind the skirt of Section 230. ProtectYourFamily (talk) 13:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 13:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC) Clearly, whatever you are here to do, it isn't to improve this project. Since you are not using this page to civilly request unblock, and instead make further insults, I have removed access. It sounds to me like you should find a project more compatible with your ideological bubble and attitude, where you can read only what you want to hear, but if you should have a change of heart, you may appeal as described. 331dot (talk) 13:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)