User talk:Protect all children

All articles on Wikipedia must be about subjects that are notable, and the original article you wrote did not demonstrate the notability of the subject. This is why it was deleted. Please read Notability and  Notability (people) and make sure that this individual meets the notability criteria.

I'm a little more concerned with what appears to be your purpose here. You write "Families in San Diego County who are being abused by these people need to be able to find out how severe the problems are in order to help their fights to protect their children and themselves. Suppressing information on this is not a good thing." Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and it is not a battleground. If you are writing articles here with the intention of promoting a particular viewpoint, no matter how mainstream or commendable that viewpoint may be, you may find that the rules of Wikipedia are not to your liking, especially the core tenets of verifiability and neutral point of view. You may want to investigate some alternative outlets. Please feel free to ask me any questions you might have. I have pasted a welcome message below which includes other helpful links. Natalie (talk) 04:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Notability of Albert Raymond Carder
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Albert Raymond Carder, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Albert Raymond Carder seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Albert Raymond Carder, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Elizabeth Jane via
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Elizabeth Jane via, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Elizabeth Jane via. ukexpat (talk) 21:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Alicia Wade for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alicia Wade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alicia Wade until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 19:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)