User talk:Protectanimal

Ahold Delhaize
Hello. I just undid your edit to the Ahold Delhaize article because (a) the tone of the writing does not comply with WP:NPOV and (b) the sourcing of the material does not comply with WP:RS. None of this is to say that the material is "wrong." However, it must be properly cited. You also may want to review WP:RSP. ThePhantom65 (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

The edits you recently made to the Ahold Delhaize article are based on sourcing from an animal rights group and blogs that do not meet WP:RS. I would strongly urge you to review these policies before making additional edits to this or any other page. ThePhantom65 (talk) 08:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shangri-La Hotels and Resorts. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. A level 2 warning is warranted since the the previous warning is about a similar edit made on another page. – robertsky (talk) 11:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
– robertsky (talk) 16:27, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/EmilyEquitas. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)