User talk:ProtoDrake

GA review of Vinland Saga
I feel that your quick-pass GA review of Vinland Saga missed a lot. I went to the article to do a quick review for DYK, and I found a lot of problems. A significant portion of the prose was incomprehensible or poorly paraphrased, there were neutrality issues (primary sources used in critical reception section), and copyvio (a 176-word quotation, in excess of fair use). There may be more problems that I missed. Please be careful and refrain from rubber-stamping reviews. Thanks. – Reidgreg (talk) 13:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Probably right. Should it be taken to GAR? --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm hesitant to do that for a recent review. Maybe you could ask for a second opinion or re-review at Wikipedia talk:GAN? – Reidgreg (talk) 14:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

38 Studios
I'm sad to see you removing the GAN for 38 Studios yet again. Would you consider leaving the nomination open if I took care of fixing the reviewer's concerns on your behalf? IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 14:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That's a kind offer, but I'm honestly getting very busy in real life and need to re-evaluate/analyse my Wiki work so I can continue to produce good quality without impeding on anything else. I don't have the mental investment to respond to 38 Studios GAN comments just through lack of interest. I think that's part of why I fudged the Vinland Saga review so badly. I need to find my passion again (Sands of Destruction is providing that a bit). --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It really wouldn't bother me at all! Of course, I would understand if you wanna finish it yourself. In that case, I hope to see you in good shape in the not too distant future. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 20:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I sincerely wouldn't mind someone, you say, nominating it for yourself if you want to. Only if you want to. I'd be okay to help on some point if needed, and if you wanted to nom it yourself I really wouldn't mind. Wikipedia's a collective effort after all, no-one owns an article. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * To me, that would feel like taking credit for something I had very little impact on. I'll leave the nomination up to you; just know that I'm here to support it however I can. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 11:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Just so our mutual positions are clear, to me, letting someone else carry a GAN I nominated would leave me in the same position. I'd feel like I was taking credit for someone else's effort and work. --ProtoDrake (talk) 12:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sands of Destruction
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sands of Destruction you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SnowFire -- SnowFire (talk) 18:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sands of Destruction
The article Sands of Destruction you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sands of Destruction for comments about the article, and Talk:Sands of Destruction/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SnowFire -- SnowFire (talk) 18:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Lelouch Lamperouge
This is an article I expanded this year and had it copyedited. It's kinda big though so I get it if you don't wanna review. If possible we could exchange another review.Tintor2 (talk) 00:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Rather busy IRL, and after my complete clanger with the Vinland TV article (told you about that on your talk page, hope you caught it) I'm wary of anime-related articles. --ProtoDrake (talk) 15:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I see. No problem. When it comes game project, so far my only interest is improving Metal Gear Rising: Revengeanc Tintor2 (talk) 16:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 63
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 63, May – June 2024  Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * One new partner
 * 1Lib1Ref
 * Spotlight: References check