User talk:ProtoJeb21

June 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to TRAPPIST-1g, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 16:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please refer to MOS:HEADINGS for the proper heading level conventions. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to TRAPPIST-1g, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 18:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luyten b


The article Luyten b has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kepler-80d, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Whispe ring  22:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Kepler-10. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Praemonitus (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

No original research
Please stop adding your own views to Wikipedia articles. This is against Wikipedia policy of no original research, see WP:OR. In particular please stop adding a list of planets to the mega-Earth article. There are no references describing these as mega-Earths or even rocky planets, that's just your own interpretation of the data. Fdfexoex (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about K2-187b
Hello, ProtoJeb21,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether K2-187b should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/K2-187b.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Lithopsian (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about K2-183b
Hello, ProtoJeb21,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether K2-183b should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/K2-183b.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Lithopsian (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve K2-157b
Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. ProtoJeb21, thanks for creating K2-157b!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Not every exoplanet needs an article. WP:GNG applies, where there should be more than one writing about the planet, with substantial content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about K2-157b
Hello, ProtoJeb21,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether K2-157b should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/K2-157b.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Lithopsian (talk) 11:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (K2-229b) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating K2-229b, ProtoJeb21!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Reviewed, well done, in-depth article. Thanks for creating"

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)