User talk:Protolink24

Grado Labs
I have reverted some changes you made to Grado Labs. Some paragraphs of criticism were taken out, ones that were not supported by reliable sources. Please read WP:RS and WP:CITE for how to gauge a source and cite it in the article.

I took out your "example" reference as unnecessary, and restored the overt naming of the fact that critical data were missing from the frequency response tables. I don't think that putting that information in a footnote is enough. Most people will see the little blue [1] and merely think that the footnote adds to reliability of the data, rather than scrolling down to see that the footnote details the UNreliability. Frequency response without magnitude information is useless marketing drivel. Binksternet (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)