User talk:Protzkrog

Speedy deletion of Wireless User Group
A tag has been placed on Wireless User Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Whpq (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ptawug
A tag has been placed on Ptawug, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Superflewis (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ptawug
A tag has been placed on Ptawug requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dmwiki (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ptawug
A tag has been placed on Ptawug, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TheMolecularMan (talk) 09:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, applied wrong criteria at first. Note that this is changed from reposting of deleted content to non-notable organization. TheMolecularMan (talk) 09:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ''Please do not recreate a page that was deleted through the speedy deletion process. It will only be deleted again.'' TheMolecularMan (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Pta jhb wugmeet1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pta jhb wugmeet1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of CTWUG
A tag has been placed on CTWUG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BigDunc Talk 10:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jawug
A tag has been placed on Jawug requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs /Improve 11:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ptawug
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ptawug, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Non-notable tiny organization

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Independent wireless network groups
I think these article are likely to be deleted, but you might be able to write an article on the topic more generally and include the individual groups there. Just a suggestion, and I'm not saying it would necessarily be notable (safe from deletion), but it was a thought I had. Take care. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

I fully support keeping the content you have added, which I think is interesting and relevant, but tend to agree with ChildofMidnight: a more general article about wireless network groups in South Africa could be more appropriate. It could discuss the concept in general, history, implications etc. with short sections on each of the more significant groups. The individual articles you have written are perhaps a bit too detailed. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:04, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:PTAWUG RV Routerboard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PTAWUG RV Routerboard.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of South African wireless user groups
I have nominated South African wireless user groups, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/South African wireless user groups. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs  19:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:CTWUG logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:CTWUG logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:PTAWUG logo.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PTAWUG logo.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:PTAWUG Die Wilgers Highsite1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:PTAWUG Die Wilgers Highsite1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MGA73 (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Same problem seems to excist with: Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1)  File:PTAWUG_Highsite_CP.JPG
 * 2)  File:PTAWUG_Highsite_IR.jpg
 * 3)  File:PTAWUG_Highsite_LW.jpg
 * 4)  File:PTAWUG_Highsite_ML.jpg
 * 5)  File:PTAWUG_Highsite_PN.jpg
 * 6)  File:PTAWUG_Highsite_RL.jpg
 * 7)  File:PTAWUG_Highsite_RR.jpg
 * 8)  File:PTAWUG_Highsite_WG.jpg
 * 9)  File:PTAWUG_Highsite_ZK.jpg
 * 10)  File:PTAWUG_DW_toring_opsit_1.jpg
 * 11)  File:PTAWUG_DW_toring_opsit_2.jpg
 * 12)  File:PTAWUG_RV_Routerboard.jpg

Nomination of Pretoria Wireless Users Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pretoria Wireless Users Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pretoria Wireless Users Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Allan Nonymous (talk) 04:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)