User talk:Proud Indian Guy

Welcome!
Hello, Proud Indian Guy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Delhi did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. BilCat (talk) 06:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Delhi. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Delhi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Do not POV push. There are different data on ethnic composition in different sources. No need to highlight data from one source.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at West Bengal‎, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:18, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Manipulation of GSDP and NSDP per capita figures of West Bengal
Please refrain from manipulating sourced figures without providing a reliable source that explicitly supports your figures. First of all, in article List of Indian states and union territories by GDP per capita, you changed figures of West Bengal citing this WB government source but figures added by you do not even match with the figures for WB's per capita GSDP mentioned in this source. You incorrectly added All India per capita GDP figure of Rs. 141,447 as WB's per capita GSDP. The actual per capita GSDP figure of WB, i.e. Rs. 116,831 is mentioned under "Overview of State Economy" in the PDF source just 2 pages after All India per capita GDP is mentioned. Check that properly.

Secondly, you can't add even the above mentioned correct per capita GSDP figures for WB in the concerned list article because in that list article the respective per capita NSDP figures have been mentioned for all Indian states and UTs instead of per capita GSDP. This has been done since the official figures for per capita NSDP are available for all states and UTs while those for per capita GSDP are available for only a few states. Also, per capita NSDP is a more accurate measure of per capita state income as compared to per capita GSDP. You cannot add per capita GSDP of one particular state (WB in this case) in a list in which per capita NSDP has been mentioned for all other states/ UTs. This will incorrectly inflate WB's ranking since per capita GSDP (Gross) is obviously higher than per capita NSDP (Net). The present per capita NSDP figures in the article have been taken from the official source of GOI's Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI) and those figures are the most reliable and latest available ones. You're not supposed to change them and create unnecessary clutter.

Also, you added incorrect figures for WB's total GDP of 2018-19 (Rs. 13.16 lakh crore) in article List of Indian states and union territories by GDP citing the same source when the actual figure mentioned in that source are 11.50 lakh crore. I've corrected them but you're not supposed to add your own imaginary values under the garb of some source which mention altogether different values. It constitutes original research and vandalism and you can get blocked from editing if you continue to do this. Thank you. Vibhss (talk) 12:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Kolkata. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 04:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)