User talk:Provenant

September 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Chemtrail conspiracy theory, you may be blocked from editing. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 05:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

How is it disruptive editing to remove the bias inherent in the text? By labeling a minority theory "conspiracy" you write it off. Since an encyclopedia's editorial stance is neutral, why fight so hard to keep "conspiracy" in the text, when there are reputable scientists who do maintain that there is a spraying program, which result in persistent trails that are not the normal contrails. I did not add reams of controversial material, I simply tweaked out the bias. In fact the article itself references the documentary "Why Are They Spraying" which contains cogent interviews with members of the scientific community who do hold that the persistent trails are not the result of the normal condensation which occurs from burning jet fuel.

Deleting "conspiracy" and adding "mainstream" simply removes bias from the article while still leaving the obvious, that the "Chemtrail Theory" is a decidedly minority viewpoint. If the idea is that the reader should form their own informed opinion from the sources, then the shading of the text with loaded terms such as "conspiracy" is anathema to that objective. How is it disruptive editing to edit out bias in an article?

Provenant (talk) 22:05, 25 September 2012 (UTC)