User talk:Prowikipedians/Archives

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Prowikipedians! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel (talk) 06:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Maitreya Project
Dear Prowikipedians, please see Maitreya Project talk page re waterbowls sentence in Criticisms section. David Woodward (talk) 02:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Dear Prowikipedians, please can you fix up the waterbowls reference on Maitreya Project. The reference is a bit mixed up. There are 2 urls, one for Land of Medicine Buddha & one for Taipei Times, neither is showing up in the ref, i have tried to fix it up but it is a bit confusing. Please also see new comment on waterbowl section of discussion page, still does not fit with style WP:DATED & frankly i have a few other concerns. David Woodward (talk) 12:32, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Dear Prowikipedians, me again. I've tried to have a go at fixing the reference? Please see talk page, where i shall shortly be making a few points on edits, changes and additions David Woodward (talk) 06:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive
The above article has been deleted according to criteria for speedy deletion. It provided insufficient context (A1) and did not assert notability (A7). Please do not re-create it. Instead, if you feel the deletion was in error, you may request a deletion review. Before doing so, you should be prepared to demonstrate its notability under our guidelines. Kafziel Complaint Department 06:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you explain why it's not notable? It has just been created and takes some time to establish notability. Prowikipedians (talk) 07:11, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, keep in mind that this is an "organization." According to Wikipedia discription (here), it states that
 * An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.
 * therefore, stating that article "Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive" is fine, no? A long list of secondary sources can be seen here. The name "Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive" may sound un-notable itself by the way its name, but can you please review it? (I understand that "something-school-group" is definitely not notable.) Thanks. Prowikipedians (talk) 07:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If you want it reviewed, request a review the way I told you. This is (apparently) a website, so you'll have to prove how it meets WP:WEB (not WP:CORP), and those Google results certainly won't help you do that. I don't see anything there that constitutes significant coverage in a reliable, independent secondary source. Kafziel Complaint Department 06:06, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * therefore, stating that article "Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive" is fine, no? A long list of secondary sources can be seen here. The name "Lama Yeshe Wisdom Archive" may sound un-notable itself by the way its name, but can you please review it? (I understand that "something-school-group" is definitely not notable.) Thanks. Prowikipedians (talk) 07:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If you want it reviewed, request a review the way I told you. This is (apparently) a website, so you'll have to prove how it meets WP:WEB (not WP:CORP), and those Google results certainly won't help you do that. I don't see anything there that constitutes significant coverage in a reliable, independent secondary source. Kafziel Complaint Department 06:06, 9 July 2008 (UTC)