User talk:Prrabatt

Questions
About this comment, would you please tell me: a) who do you mean by "our"? b) students of what c) and what is the "CCC study group"? d) Is your account being used by multiple people? Thanks Jytdog (talk) 00:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

I am not a contributor and have concerns about being quizzed about my details in this way in order to identify me. This is a very sensitive subject and trying to identify persons is inappropriate in context. I am assured that I nor any groups I am in have no conflicts. My answers to all questions are: a) No, b) No, c) No, d) No it is not. Prrabatt (talk) 01:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Apart from d), none of these responses actually answer the question. It is wholly appropriate to check whether users have a conflict of interest, as I believe you may do. Therefore, please answer the above questions properly. In particular, do you have an affiliation with the company, and what is your "CCC study group"? Joseph2302 (talk) 09:45, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

After reading talk pages, I observe and accept that many editors on this site have unrealized stalking or trolling behaviours under the acceptable cloak of anonymity. Some go so far to dig for any old policy to bother others. But once again, as a non-contributor, I have been quizzed in a way as to discover my identity under another pretext. I will again state "I am assured that I nor any groups I am in have no conflicts" and this is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. I hope my affirmation under duress is the end of this matter. Prrabatt (talk) 22:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * There's no stalking issues here, but the fact you've been discussing this off-Wiki with a group of people that you won't disclose who they are is very suspicious, and suggests an obvious COI. No-one is stalking you, it was you that mentioned your off-Wiki involvement in the issue. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Prrabatt, you're not required to out yourself or to disclose info that would indirectly out you. The problem is that the !vote you gave at the AfD is very strange. You refer to "our CCC study group" -- if you expect your argument to have some sort of weight then you should be ready to explain what you mean, as right now it's very unclear. Are you a teacher? Is it a group of university students or something else?

Also "and for some reason I have problems posting on deletion and talk pages" -- what did you mean by that? As we can see you've been able to post just fine. (Though it's possible that earlier you were unable to post due to having your then-current IP blocked -- did you see a block message? or were the pages protected from editing?)

And "What is concerning is that some students have also reported hostilities when trying to discuss this or other CCC matters." -- Do these students have Wikipedia accounts? Have they participated in discussions, if yes then on which articles? Have they been blocked? Any sort of "hostilities" are not really tolerated on Wikipedia and can be reported to administrators at WP:ANI. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 10:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Pretty much as Jeraphine Gryphon said... All are welcome to edit and improve Wikipedia and your input is valid and appreciated. Perhaps if you were as little clearer as to your argument for the keeping of the Phoenix Global article that may make things clearer. 79616gr (talk) 06:03, 20 June 2015 (UTC)