User talk:Prsgoddess187/Archive 3

Edward VII of the United Kingdom
While I have no information one way or the other, it would have been possible for Edward to have been created Prince of Wales on 8 Dec since he was born on 9 Nov - a month earlier. Ian Cairns 17:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter

 * Thanks Prsgoddess. ;-) M o e   ε  23:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Austrian Emperors Francis Joseph and Charles
Hello Annamarie,

I have brought the articles for these two emperors up for move. Would you care to lend some insight and possibly a vote? Thanks. Charles 20:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

This is Moe

 * Thanks, I'll keep in touch.. -- M o e   ε  18:34, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

The "Canadian Royal Family"
Any opinions on whether there exists such a thing as a Canadian Royal Family? See Talk:Court Circular Astrotrain 15:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Two misnamed royals
Hi Prsgoddess;

Can you join the vote at Talk:Marie-Chantal, Princess of Greece and Denmark and Talk:Cecilie of Mecklenburg-Schwerin? They have been moved without discussion. Thanks. Charles 16:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Pretenders Ernst August
Please see Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles) and constibute to the discussion there. I look forward to people assessing UE:should English be used in all these cases and how; would any sort of numeral be acceptable; what are the correct ordinals anyway; and Is there any other sustainable way to disambiguate these systematically. Shilkanni 11:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

question
hi Prsgoddess187, how are you, long time no hear? Question: I am thinking that these articles probably need to be moved, Leopold V of Austria (Babenberg) who IMO should be "Leopold V, Duke of Austria", similarly to Henry XIII, Duke of Bavaria and the other Leopold V of Austria (Habsburg) would be "Archduke Leopold V of Austria". I took a deep look again at Naming conventions (names and titles), since the format "xxxx of xxxx" only applies to monarchs, and both were not as far as I know, so there seems to be something not in order with the current articles. Same thing applies to all the rest of the non-royal Habsburgs. I also contacted the users who created the article, but would like to hear your thoughts on this as well. thanks. Gryffindor 18:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Princess Beatrice
Hi Prsgoddess,

I gather you're not too happy about the page move... I probably should have consulted more, but the talk page was empty, and no one seemed to have entered any debate on the issue so I decided to be WP:BOLD. Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom didn't seem like the right title to me as it could just as easily refer to Princess Beatrice of York who is, self evidently, also of the United Kingdom. The page was at its current location for more than a year, so I put it back to that. It should be noted also that having commas in titled personnages is not without precedence, as with Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson, which also looks rather odd. Anyway, what would be your suggestion for the page title? (and should we maybe hold such discussions on the talk page of the article itself rather than on user talk pages?) Cheers, and have a good day &mdash; SteveRwanda 14:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Please note
Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages, thanks. ed g2s &bull; talk 19:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Nicholas II of Russia Page
Heya, I am Sara. I saw on the Nicholas II of Russia page that you were confused about the dates of 16th/17th July. If someone hasn't already explained, then there is some deliberation about the time of the execution. Some say it was after midnight (so it was the 17th) and some say before (so it was 16th). The execution did record that it was something like 0130 or 0230 at the time of the executions. The rule of thumb is that they were executed on the 17th July, so the bodies would have been dealt with on the same day. The author might have meant that the final preparations for the burial were made on 16th July. Hoep this helps, --SaraFL 13:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)