User talk:Prubach

Welcome!
Hello, Prubach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was SORCER, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle  Faddle  23:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Hi Timtrent, thanks for the welcome message. I fully understand the Wiki regulations, so I only wanted to add a reference to SORCER but I don't want to directly edit the document to avoid any conflicts of interest. Today, I also noticed there is a lot of discussion between 74 and Martin Hoekstra on Exertion-Oriented Programming that SORCER implements. I'd be glad to help, clarify and answer any questions but I don't want to be directly involved in writing the article myself.Prubach (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I think you are wise to stand aside. May I suggest that you deploy Request edit on the talk page of the precise article you would like to edit if you were editing it personally. Then define the edit you would like others to make with as much precision as you are able.


 * Thank you for adopting the careful and correct approach. Fiddle   Faddle  17:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

howdy
Hello Paweł, left you some questions over at WT:Articles_for_creation/Exertion-oriented_programming. In other news, some discussion about who will be working on what, here. Talk:SORCER. Also, I have attempted to rewrite the first paragraph of SORCER into a more neutral form, please give me your suggestions and criticisms. Talk:SORCER. As we are going down the SORCER article paragraph by paragraph, I'll try to incorporate a summarized essence of our discussion on EOP, too. That said, the fuller article on exertion-oriented programming will remain, and we can get into the deeper details there. Thanks for improving wikipedia, it's appreciated. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 19:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello again, happy proleptic gregorian increment. :-)   Left you and Professor Sobolewski a note, over here &mdash; User_talk:Mwsobol &mdash; feel free to discuss with me on my talkpage, if you like (click 'talk' by my name, then click 'new section' at the top, leave me a message, and click 'save').  Thanks for improving wikipedia.  74.192.84.101 (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Michael V Sobolewski.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Michael V Sobolewski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Michael Vladyslav Sobolewski
Hello, Prubach

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username CatcherStorm and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Michael Vladyslav Sobolewski, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Michael Vladyslav Sobolewski.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 CatcherStorm    talk   00:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello CatcherStorm, I added a message in the discussion at Thanks