User talk:Prufrock79

Hey again, thanks for the note, and good job finding the references on Slant Magazine! I'm impressed by your hard work to improve the article. But keep working on it, it still needs more. Another thing is that I'd look for references that actually feature the magazine (i.e. the whole article or piece is about the magazine, or it discusses it in detail) rather than just mentioning it. Remember, you must be able to back up each claim in the article with reliable sources, those sentences that aren't backed up can be removed at any time. Anyway, great work so far. Keep in touch! Definitely let me know if you need help with anything. Peace, delldot   talk  06:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Reviews
Please don't put reviews in the |Reviews = field. We don't use that anymore. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * QUIT USING THE REVIEWS FIELD.   Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, please don't edit archived talk pages, as you did here: Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:27, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Please. Don't. Put. Reviews. In. The. Infobox. Is there some word in that sentence you're not understanding? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:40, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * When a page is formatted with the new professional ratings table, I use that. If I have added reviews to an infobox since first seeing these reprimands from you, it's because the infobox is already there and the professional ratings table is not. Are those pages never supposed to be updated with new content, or are you saying that I'm expected to reformat the whole page before adding something? Also, I didn't realize I edited an "archived" talk page. A lot of the protocol on this site isn't exactly obvious.Prufrock79 (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Revscore limit
I reverted your edit to Wrecking Ball (Bruce Springsteen album). Per WP:ALBUMSEL#Critical reception, no more than 10 reviews should be included in the template. Dan56 (talk) 19:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

If you work for Slant Magazine, you need to disclose this on your user page
Per WP:COI and WP:PAID. It seems your contributions, at least for the last two years, have only been to add poorly formatted Slant Magazine references to album articles. If you work for the site, you need to disclose your connection. If you are just a fan of the website, then either way, please fill out the references you add better by adding the publication date, accessdate, author of the article and actually adding the title from the website and not just the lazy "Slant review". Thank you.  Ss  112   09:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)